IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] Proposed drafts to become WG documents [draft-shen-isis-oper-enhance-00, draft-amante-isis-reverse-metric-02]

Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Wed, 27 April 2011 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <danny@tcb.net>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE491E06C9 for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.358
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.241, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C9s2pq0TEWFA for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from farnsworth.verisignlabs.com (farnsworth.verisignlabs.com [72.13.58.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73373E06DA for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from monsoon.verisignlabs.com (h87.s239.verisign.com [216.168.239.87]) by farnsworth.verisignlabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCED8D40; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:54:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dul1dmcphers-m2.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (dul1dmcphers-m2.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.131.210.13]) by monsoon.verisignlabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2921242521; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:54:09 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <EF848F0C-BA6E-4B5A-8178-162E4368F1B6@rawdofmt.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:54:09 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9908423E-FD5D-4F22-A538-2727830ACD8F@tcb.net>
References: <EF848F0C-BA6E-4B5A-8178-162E4368F1B6@rawdofmt.org>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@rawdofmt.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "isis-wg@ietf.org list" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Proposed drafts to become WG documents [draft-shen-isis-oper-enhance-00, draft-amante-isis-reverse-metric-02]
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:54:11 -0000

Although your query doesn't asked for positive indictors, I support 
adoption of both these drafts as WG items :-)

-danny


On Apr 27, 2011, at 9:32 AM, Christian Hopps wrote:

> During IETF 79 the following drafts were presented to the WG and a request to make them WG documents was not met with objection. Are there objections on the list to the following drafts becoming isis-wg documents?
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shen-isis-oper-enhance-00
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-amante-isis-reverse-metric-02
> 
> Thanks,
> CHopps & DWard.
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email