IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isms] wg rechartering

"Dave Nelson" <d.b.nelson@comcast.net> Sat, 28 March 2009 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <d.b.nelson@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: isms@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isms@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AC63A6A03 for <isms@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.787
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.787 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.812, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GjeCROe84Jqs for <isms@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from QMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2372D3A68F1 for <isms@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from OMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36]) by QMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Ycsw1b00R0mv7h051h73a6; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:07:03 +0000
Received: from NEWTON603 ([71.232.143.198]) by OMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Yh731b00H4H2mdz3Xh73Zm; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:07:03 +0000
From: Dave Nelson <d.b.nelson@comcast.net>
To: isms@ietf.org
References: <238B21C88B154B0DA8F92428E957AAD2@xpsuperdvd2><C5F2E10E.33229%kaushik@cisco.com><20090328064413.GB25935@elstar.local> <E6886146D3C04F6C9E648119869EBB22@NEWTON603> <014a01c9afc2$8953da60$f4438182@china.huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:07:04 -0400
Message-ID: <5DA498F9D6034CCFA70575D2FE53EA77@NEWTON603>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
In-Reply-To: <014a01c9afc2$8953da60$f4438182@china.huawei.com>
Thread-Index: AcmvcKn+zLTYbZdgSdCtHmiG7DPOzQANmbogAAbY6TAAANyHoA==
Subject: Re: [Isms] wg rechartering
X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms>
List-Post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:06:08 -0000

David Harrington writes...

> Can you republish the expired draft as starting point?

Which expired draft is that?  draft-narayan-isms-sshsm-radius-02.txt?  I see
that draft name referenced in the ISMS minutes.

That's an earlier version of the RADIUS Usage draft that we've just
submitted to the IESG. In taking a quick look at that draft, I don't see any
*substantial* discussion of access control authorization.  The only
reference seems to be:

2.4.  SNMP Access Control Authorization

   [radman] describes a RADIUS attribute that can be used for SNMP
   access control authorization, however, the details of how an SNMP
   Access Control Model, such as the View-based Access Control Model
   (VACM), might utilize RADIUS authorization are the topic of current
   research, and beyond the scope of this document.

We may have had another early draft that delved deeper into access control
authorization, but it's not that one.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email