Re: [Isms] updated TLS drafts published: -06 and -07
"tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com> Mon, 01 February 2010 17:36 UTC
Return-Path: <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
X-Original-To: isms@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isms@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075C928C186 for <isms@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:36:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.293
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.293 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.306, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HtdCeu8duLvk for <isms@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F298A28C165 for <isms@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:36:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Trace: 324354304/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$PIPEX-ACCEPTED/pipex-customers/62.188.105.122/None/cfinss@dial.pipex.com
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 62.188.105.122
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: cfinss@dial.pipex.com
X-SMTP-AUTH:
X-MUA: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsgFAM6fZks+vGl6/2dsb2JhbACCJhYWhSWJAcoJDIQ5BA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,384,1262563200"; d="scan'208";a="324354304"
X-IP-Direction: IN
Received: from 1cust122.tnt2.lnd9.gbr.da.uu.net (HELO allison) ([62.188.105.122]) by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with SMTP; 01 Feb 2010 17:37:11 +0000
Message-ID: <000201caa35c$bef7a5a0$0601a8c0@allison>
From: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
References: <sd636nhxgk.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net> <20100201150354.GB5475@elstar.local>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:13:58 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Cc: isms@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isms] updated TLS drafts published: -06 and -07
X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms>
List-Post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:36:47 -0000
----- Original Message ----- From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder" <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:03 PM > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:42:03AM +0100, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > > This document has no outstanding issues left with it that have been > > brought up by working group members. I believe it is ready for it > > to be submitted to the IESG. > > I did the required idnits check and here is the result (trimmed down > to thing that might matter): > > == You're using the IETF Trust Provisions' Section 6.b License Notice from 12 > Sep 2009 rather than the newer Notice from 28 Dec 2009. (See > http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/) > > We might have to switch to the 28 Dec 2009 version. > > -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4366 > (Obsoleted by RFC 5246) > > This seems to be intentional. > > -- No information found for draft-seggelmann-tls-dtls-heartbeat - is the name > correct? > > The name seems to be correct; no clue why idnits fails on this one. Perhaps because it has expired; it was published 6 Jul 2009 so is almost a month gone by now. Tom Petch > /js >
- [Isms] updated TLS drafts published: -06 and -07 Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] updated TLS drafts published: -06 and … Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] updated TLS drafts published: -06 and … tom.petch
- Re: [Isms] updated TLS drafts published: -06 and … Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] updated TLS drafts published: -06 and … Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] updated TLS drafts published: -06 and … tom.petch
- Re: [Isms] updated TLS drafts published: -06 and … Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] updated TLS drafts published: -06 and … Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] updated TLS drafts published: -06 and … Wes Hardaker