IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isms] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5953 (2670)

Robert Story <Robert.Story@cobham.com> Wed, 15 December 2010 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <Robert.Story@cobham.com>
X-Original-To: isms@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isms@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C1C28C10F for <isms@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:50:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.193
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.193 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.406, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QaSbWIX3aiGf for <isms@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:50:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16423A6FA8 for <isms@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:50:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id oBFGq4WF030457; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:52:04 -0600
Received: from mailbin2.ads.sparta.com (mailbin.sparta.com [157.185.85.6]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBFGq3VF027120; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:52:03 -0600
Received: from sparta.com ([76.122.68.129]) by mailbin2.ads.sparta.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:52:02 -0500
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:51:57 -0500
From: Robert Story <Robert.Story@cobham.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <20101215115157.6b89b2aa@sparta.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101215073633.93393E070C@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20101215073633.93393E070C@rfc-editor.org>
Organization: SPARTA
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Sig_/WE2eF4Yt+/yPU1mgyA40WJY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Dec 2010 16:52:03.0000 (UTC) FILETIME=[65E97B80:01CB9C78]
Cc: isms@ietf.org, tim.polk@nist.gov, Russ.Mundy@sparta.com, ietf@hardakers.net
Subject: Re: [Isms] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5953 (2670)
X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms>
List-Post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:50:25 -0000

On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:36:33 -0800 RFC wrote:
RES> Original Text
RES> -------------
RES> snmpTargetParamsRowStatus       = 4          (createAndGo0
RES> 
RES> Corrected Text
RES> --------------
RES> snmpTargetParamsRowStatus       = 4          (createAndGo)

I noticed this too.. I read up on submitting errata and it seems like it
said that only errors that caused an issue with the specification were
considered. But if we're making corrections, then a more serious typo
is that snmpTargetAddrColumnStatus (also in the appendix), should be
snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.

-- 
Robert Story
Senior Software Engineer
SPARTA (dba Cobham Analytic Soloutions)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email