Re: [ipwave] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-31.txt
John Kenney <jkenney@us.toyota-itc.com> Tue, 04 December 2018 15:38 UTC
Return-Path: <jkenney@us.toyota-itc.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E2212F18C for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 07:38:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.358
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=us-toyota-itc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xLhKioqOKkrD for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 07:38:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BB73130EDE for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 07:38:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id n9so13943397ioh.7 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 07:38:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=us-toyota-itc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5DlkZNe3vFwfTEwZa2HRkmo/Amu6k16ZcJPZaB11hEs=; b=dRSMeiaOi8kpFZJCHgut15cW3vp170MOj58lHzhlKUkpi2fRJ9wJfVq/mhzWX/gfWf lGClrMt4bli8ErKsIb3Pg3VaJZRNUnzVRca7u+Nw2bG31mE+Ri8VAnrAlnI/KY9SQYC/ Z2NCHwCqmCzBrj0ioVIExL4Hd85cpmZ5IJiuhXFfajrTTK1NDt5wqmPUo3xFu6yV0gbZ mJkGusT6pr9NFPJor6rYv6pDNfBf/lguRY8EUIH4Hr9WTKKT68dy9FCVGIiQimsBcPOn cFuUR/X7rRNZYZM7BrjuFIb6KyPLqo7Pe7n5CmLjeBrimoE7iwuQ/V4ANMce4D+UVtzE oNzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5DlkZNe3vFwfTEwZa2HRkmo/Amu6k16ZcJPZaB11hEs=; b=c4U3KVuL6mCjZwa5aHm0Nsq496A38zg4DKPlrnGNvmwyhNsV3WWQre2EfIHBhGIvcd dQhl2ZfCNkHy0xMX7I88Zz8yjLWRkoVw3P3Y4XG3TT9omwl7WmeQDOIDcNagR9BCFZgg nf1vjkUv++xvUSs2y5zzCl4zfvkhl/tzZrS/gn+AyHT/EIF+fMRToEQkDFUrd7p8zgVq BpMvxOhBshseXeUZRyUFlcwDCYIoqEznD6Pkjv88OmWP7H3wp+0/zYBfV5QzL56+YQCO W8gBfC4JxvncRjPZXt/dNeiMwvDOJEe+y15qWbO867NchZXzJmvWg+u6YJwdhLu4tYIs rJDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZSmX/0/oP0r/oR3IPPNWkdUPE5MHhe2Vp7KmYq7/byte/OVcvt CHFiqJv96KBoX0gTbctNnc5SMEN04QG4ilbOCk+xsyHKjqg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WJYg1MaKtrmk3U3UHzXEFay/AMMqxjJr8vbMftPSjQ3k8/c2YRuePKTZa3/rtew9UoiNTbuLBGv2zPQ7oSfVQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3b4f:: with SMTP id i76mr18676572ioa.266.1543937887505; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 07:38:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <154265051210.5320.13285322581737635986.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <22d298c1-cae2-4d11-e2a6-1aa515276fba@gmail.com> <CAGRfTMkHLD3sPtGgEgRjfG98Z6bB38ArzxRAn8wExV_mEOpr=A@mail.gmail.com> <c73941c7-ec34-6c84-89eb-ac1460e32508@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c73941c7-ec34-6c84-89eb-ac1460e32508@gmail.com>
From: John Kenney <jkenney@us.toyota-itc.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 07:37:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP6QOWQs6tt1uaehJEw79h9J79asmJC8oadecj3nDEY00FKspA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: Dorothy Stanley <dstanley1389@gmail.com>, its <its@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000572d0e057c340dc2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/2kAq3-Bvk06Lw14jOdrFOrULUPk>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-31.txt
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 15:38:26 -0000
Hi, Caveat: I know nothing about Neighbor Discovery protocol. I see this in the proposed new text: Due to lack of link-layer acknowledgements in 802.11-OCB, we can expect higher packet loss than for 802.11 BSS. I don't understand why it is expected that OCB has a lack of link-layer acknowledgments. OCB uses link layer acks the same way as 802.11 BSS uses them. If I send a unicast 802.11 packet outside the context of a BSS, I expect an 802.11 ACK. If I don't get the 802.11 ACK, I go through exponential backoff and retransmit. Just like normal 802.11. Maybe I'm missing something. Best Regards, John On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:11 AM Alexandre Petrescu < alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Le 04/12/2018 à 16:04, Dorothy Stanley a écrit : > > Hello Alexandre, all, > > > > I am sharing the following information from John Kenny ( > > jkenney@us.toyota-itc.com <mailto:jkenney@us.toyota-itc.com>), who is > > actively involved in 802.11p implementation and deployments: "OCB can > > use unicast in the same way as other flavors of 802.11 ( individually > > addressed 802.11 MAC PDU that is ACKed using 802.11 procedures ). I > > find this is a common misunderstanding (indeed, I am in a meeting > > right now where this very point came up about 20 minutes ago). > > Probably the confusion is partly due to the fact that a great deal of > > DSRC attention is focused on the broadcast Basic Safety Message. Some > > people think that DSRC is only BSMs, or only broadcast messages. But, > > there are some important unicast applications as well." > > > > Thus a change is needed in 4.7, either delete the second sentence or > > modify to reflect that unicast is acknowledged. > > I propose > > NEW: > > The Neighbor Discovery protocol (ND) [RFC4861] is used over > > 802.11-OCB links. Due to lack of link-layer acknowledgements in > > 802.11-OCB, we can expect higher packet loss than for 802.11 BSS. The > > ND retransmissions are supposed to handle loss of IP unicast and/or > > IP multicast just as it does for other link types. > > (remark disappeared 'unicast' and 'multicast' from 2nd phrase, and added > 'IP' in front of unicast and multicast in 3rd phrase). > > OLD: > > The Neighbor Discovery protocol (ND) [RFC4861] is used over > > 802.11-OCB links. Due to lack of link-layer acknowledgements in > > 802.11-OCB for both unicast and multicast, we can expect higher > > unicast loss than for 802.11 BSS. The ND retransmissions are > > supposed to handle loss of unicast and/or multicast just as it does > > for other link types. > > Would this be agreed by John Kenney. > > Alex > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dorothy > > > > ---------------------- Dorothy Stanley IEEE 802.11 WG Chair, > > dstanley@ieee.org <mailto:dstanley@ieee.org> Hewlett Packard > > Enterprise dorothy.stanley@hpe.com > > <mailto:dstanley@arubanetworks.com> dstanley1389@gmail.com > > <mailto:dstanley1389@gmail.com> +1 630-363-1389 <tel:630-363-1389> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:07 AM Alexandre Petrescu > > <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>> > > wrote: > > > > Hi IPWAVErs, > > > > Following the discussion during presentation of the IPv6/OCB slides > > by Nabil during IPWAVE WG meeting, I have updated the IPv6/OCB > > draft. > > > > This is the ChangeLog: > > > > - filled in the section titled "Pseudonym Handling"; - removed a 'MAY > > NOT' phrase about possibility of having other prefix than the LL on > > the link between cars; - shortened and improved the paragraph about > > Mobile IPv6, now with DNAv6; - improved the ND text about ND > > retransmissions with relationship to packet loss; - changed the title > > of an appendix from 'EPD' to 'Protocol Layering'; - improved the > > 'Aspects introduced by OCB' appendix with a few phrases about the > > channel use and references. > > > > This fixes all issues about ND and pseudonym handling. > > > > Alex > > > > -------- Message transféré -------- Sujet : New Version Notification > > for draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-31.txt Date : Mon, 19 Nov > > 2018 10:01:52 -0800 De : internet-drafts@ietf.org > > <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> Pour : Jerome Haerri > > <Jerome.Haerri@eurecom.fr <mailto:Jerome.Haerri@eurecom.fr>>, > > ipwave-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:ipwave-chairs@ietf.org>, Jerome Haerri > > <jerome.haerri@eurecom.fr <mailto:jerome.haerri@eurecom.fr>>, > > Alexandre Petrescu <Alexandre.Petrescu@cea.fr > > <mailto:Alexandre.Petrescu@cea.fr>>, Alexandre Petrescu > > <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>>, Nabil > > Benamar <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma <mailto:n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma>>, > > Thierry Ernst <thierry.ernst@yogoko.fr > > <mailto:thierry.ernst@yogoko.fr>>, Jong-Hyouk Lee > > <jonghyouk@smu.ac.kr <mailto:jonghyouk@smu.ac.kr>> > > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-31.txt has > > been successfully submitted by Alexandre Petrescu and posted to the > > IETF repository. > > > > Name: draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb Revision: 31 > > Title: Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.11 > > Networks operating in mode Outside the Context of a Basic Service Set > > (IPv6-over-80211-OCB) Document date: 2018-11-19 Group: ipwave Pages: > > 41 URL: > > > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-31.txt > > > > > > > > > Status: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb/ > > > > > > > > > Htmlized: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-31 > > Htmlized: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb > > > > > > > > > Diff: > > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-31 > > > > > > > > > Abstract: In order to transmit IPv6 packets on IEEE 802.11 networks > > running outside the context of a basic service set (OCB, earlier > > "802.11p") there is a need to define a few parameters such as the > > supported Maximum Transmission Unit size on the 802.11-OCB link, the > > header format preceding the IPv6 header, the Type value within it, > > and others. This document describes these parameters for IPv6 and > > IEEE 802.11-OCB networks; it portrays the layering of IPv6 on > > 802.11-OCB similarly to other known 802.11 and Ethernet layers - by > > using an Ethernet Adaptation Layer. > > > > > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > > tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org>. > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > _______________________________________________ its mailing list > > its@ietf.org <mailto:its@ietf.org> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its > > > > _______________________________________________ > its mailing list > its@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its > -- John Kenney Director and Principal Researcher Toyota InfoTechnology Center, USA 465 Bernardo Avenue Mountain View, CA 94043 Tel: 650-694-4160. Mobile: 650-224-6644
- [ipwave] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] Fwd: New Version Notification for dr… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [ipwave] Fwd: New Version Notification for dr… Nabil Benamar
- Re: [ipwave] Fwd: New Version Notification for dr… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [ipwave] Fwd: New Version Notification for dr… Nabil Benamar
- Re: [ipwave] Fwd: New Version Notification for dr… Dorothy Stanley
- Re: [ipwave] Fwd: New Version Notification for dr… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] Fwd: New Version Notification for dr… Dorothy Stanley
- Re: [ipwave] Fwd: New Version Notification for dr… John Kenney
- Re: [ipwave] Fwd: New Version Notification for dr… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] Fwd: New Version Notification for dr… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] ND an link-layer acks - text Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] ND an link-layer acks - text Dorothy Stanley
- Re: [ipwave] ND an link-layer acks - text Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] ND an link-layer acks - text Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [ipwave] ND an link-layer acks - text Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [ipwave] ND an link-layer acks - text Dorothy Stanley
- Re: [ipwave] ND an link-layer acks - text Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [ipwave] ND an link-layer acks - text Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] ND an link-layer acks - text Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] ND an link-layer acks - text Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] ND an link-layer acks - text Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] ND an link-layer acks - text Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] ND an link-layer acks Alexandre Petrescu