IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ipwave] LTE-V2X term in Problem Statement document

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 17 April 2019 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20C0120356 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 04:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YQrWrWGKGltv for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 04:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A782C120147 for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 04:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3HBIOmf182001 for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:18:24 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AD06205B37 for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:18:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F77B205A08 for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:18:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3HBINX1022939 for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:18:24 +0200
To: "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <abfbf312-be3c-c957-d58e-67b141697a14@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:18:23 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8B2530AB7A587B0B97DDCDA5"
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/J17Sb-h065naqh1l5YHYVSTkSdQ>
Subject: [ipwave] LTE-V2X term in Problem Statement document
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:18:29 -0000

Hi IPWAVErs,

The IPWAVE Problem Statement document uses the term 'LTE-V2X' at one 
point. ("e.g., IEEE 802.11-OCB and LTE-V2X")

I would like to suggest to make a careful definition of the term 'LTE-V2X'.

One would expect the term 'LTE-V2X' to be defined precisely at 3GPP or 
similar. But that is not the case.  The 3GPP document that is closest to 
this term is RP-161298, publicly available, defines the term 'LTE_V2X' 
(remark underscore '_', instead of dash '-').

I suggest the addition of the following term in the Problem Statement draft:

LTE-V2X: the transmission of ETSI CAM and DENM messages over IP over a 
cellular link such as 3G, 4G and successors.

Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email