[its] Potential LISP solutions for ITS
Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Thu, 12 May 2016 18:18 UTC
Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A88912D544 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2016 11:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UDnc65mlg_hE for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2016 11:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 860DB12D0F4 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2016 11:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x233.google.com with SMTP id xk12so32103107pac.0 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2016 11:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:cc:to :mime-version; bh=H0Zc7s6ngQF5TYPKAhYlwLi+wsweiUTKmic1teNMKw4=; b=utAqp7Gu5rPj4aWuCck7x1d+QKNxt1Cn8xVZ5YnieLw9EtRWukv1ggVhfTdvY1rGWR fdAWFkQ6iDfGJLylpWXDq3R9ZdoShCcuZhwftmrWBfMzjuQHI/49vV2uNeCI7sAXzpKc ev+g0nVTLlU+qvypwPu0zzUpKTATp6xpuxBDKxgp6aAjx3lLWjc7pzCxJCyrBuu3wCkt pVrSJZZLpDqmb59C91r3sDtTPqKnCPl4JkfaLgb5L2aIKpZFNE7Ic/bv0XWR+SooAgN/ LS6018AvYlJGFcqBMHzTZG1Vig/WoxSsFTn14mc6youqf2ivwuIYHpkmPrulFgM1qwos mVhQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date :message-id:cc:to:mime-version; bh=H0Zc7s6ngQF5TYPKAhYlwLi+wsweiUTKmic1teNMKw4=; b=Z82Ozq2Aoe4IPsso9gW6qGo9Gcv2i0FrCAWo4qk80vksP4UljDwsykwjhI33Drmloy Qqt+SQbRNi5RLlaRYgTUdP7hiMjhSHaut7duPNOAFmbbjPZgQiqPFBkQJ1HQmwHBz00g Ii7/cMAuxsr/ooXISrjBUq3pYH9P3eclrmwV66GnfLwH7YjftwazhTgllidF4ZhzPbf5 2aDJ8hOye/AWR5NlX0UwT5PTGD7aJ3I5z2+CxSNQwYntzkIg63Y6H6Ttha5cpYT2KSUD +hciCAWvA8RnNSK1LUUuqQs6GsX0QEf8/xGjCp8IP4TIOiA7/eJiiVX06SjoSZQN9bAE gEiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUurR7MP9yGQtSnlXU7Gux2Z7MNkb8ChaPa2gDIfWrjUK0gjOGgoz/ZAsUpCg/87Q==
X-Received: by 10.67.13.144 with SMTP id ey16mr16005159pad.147.1463077091185; Thu, 12 May 2016 11:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 19sm21431301pfu.83.2016.05.12.11.18.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 May 2016 11:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 11:18:07 -0700
Message-Id: <D318FF95-6DBA-4A8D-A41C-2D5C12541E2C@gmail.com>
To: its@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/Xf3Hmj8Fpfhpq58DZdwBqGIN7YA>
Cc: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma0528@gmail.com>
Subject: [its] Potential LISP solutions for ITS
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: ITS at IETF discussion list <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 18:18:13 -0000
We just posted some new IDs in the LISP working group. You guys may be interested. The “predictive-RLOCs” draft is probably the most applicable to ITS. Thanks in advance for your review. Dino https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-00.txt https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-farinacci-lisp-eid-anonymity-00.txt https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-00.txt https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-farinacci-lisp-predictive-rlocs-00.txt
- [its] Potential LISP solutions for ITS Dino Farinacci