Re: [ipwave] WGLC for draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-08 - informational references

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 05/10/2017 à 17:33, Abdussalam Baryun a écrit :
[...]
>>     [AB]   Please delete those documents which are not ietf-wg-adopted
>>     or maybe have many errors (there are errors in some RFCs but they
>>     are very few because many discussions and reviews). I think we
>>     adopted this document and we need to delete documents that are not
>>     even adopted. However, 2464 is not for wireless communications.
> 
> 
>     Please do not delete the references.  We welcome references to other
>     documents, whether or not they are IETF documents.
> 
> 
> Yes we may welcome when needed, but I think the doc is referencing as a 
> survey but please note this is not a survey/informational doc.

I am still not convinced about removing that.  That survey/informational 
is looking at joining with the problem statement drafts.  At that point 
it would make sense to refer to them, unless you disagree.

in -09 we say:
> In the published literature, many documents describe aspects and
> problems related to running IPv6 over 802.11-OCB:
> [I-D.ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey].

Additionally,

There are a three other individual submission documents that we refer 
to.  I believe they are necessary at this time.

draft-perkins-intarea-multicast-ieee802: a good starting point for WiFi 
problems on multicast.  If no other reference, then I keep i.

draft-petrescu-its-scenarios-reqs: it's because we need to tell in this 
draft what kinds of scenarios we look at (the vehicular scenarios).  If 
there is some other RFC or draft that describes the scenarios then I can 
put that instead.

draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis: it's because it's the only little try to 
update rfc2464 at this time.  If it gets adopted in 6man then it will be 
fine.

Alex