IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] Draft minutes of IPWAVE@IETF98 available

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 06 April 2017 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CBF128896 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 04:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ifmVuXzPY9xd for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 04:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECC571293E9 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 04:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v36BhrsJ031272; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:43:53 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id DE15C203006; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:43:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1FC202934; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:43:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v36Bhri5031241; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:43:53 +0200
To: dickroy@alum.mit.edu, cjbc@it.uc3m.es, its@ietf.org
References: <1491334470.3575.9.camel@it.uc3m.es> <8057466055914FB89C1597E66E42926B@SRA6>
Cc: 'Russ Housley' <housley@vigilsec.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4d8204ff-44d5-ff3c-9c2f-3b54a90ace9a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 13:43:32 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8057466055914FB89C1597E66E42926B@SRA6>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/emYhQa3szbBZPSgnIQ2sC3Lg7Rk>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Draft minutes of IPWAVE@IETF98 available
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:44:00 -0000

Dick,

Le 05/04/2017 à 01:40, Dick Roy a écrit :
> All,
>
> These are comments only, as I was not present at the meeting.
>
> 1) While there are such things as IEEE 802.11 beacons, they are NOT
> sent when dot11OCBActivated is true.

Agreed.  The text is so too.

> 2) IEEE Std1609.2 DOES exist.
>
> 3) I would definitely NOT call the LLC sublayer "interface" between
> the 802.11 MAC and the IPv6 networking layer SNAP.  SNAP is on its
> way out, along with all the other 802.2 LLC functionality, AND most
> importantly, communications in the 5.9GHz in the US use type
> encoding (EPD if you are an IEEE Std802 O&M fan).  Call it what it
> is: "EPD".

Ok, we will keep the "EPD" layer in the figure.

Additionally, as presented in Chicago (slide 4), and based on your SNAP 
comment above, I suggest the following SNAP text below:
> In addition to the description of interface between IP and MAC using
> "Ethernet Adaptation Layer" and "Ethernet Protocol Discrimination
> (EPD)" it is worth mentioning that SNAP [RFC1042] was used earlier to
> carry the IPv6 Ethertype.

[...]

> 4) No single set of standards is going to "resolve the privacy
> concern". Privacy is a system concept the takes a lot of effort at
> every layer in the system to properly implement.
>
> 5) STAs operating OCB are NOT STAs operating in ad hoc mode; thus,
> OCB STAs should not be labeled as ad hoc STAs.

Agreed.  OCB STAs will be labeled just "STA".

Alex

>
> Hope this helps.
>
> RR
>
> PS.  Alex, I don't believe the reflector problem has been resolved
> yet, so forward this if you feel it's appropriate.
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: its [mailto:its-bounces@ietf.org]
> On Behalf Of Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano Sent: Tuesday, April 4,
> 2017 12:35 PM To: its@ietf.org Cc: Russ Housley Subject: [ipwave]
> Draft minutes of IPWAVE@IETF98 available
>
> Hi,
>
> We've just posted the minutes:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/minutes/minutes-98-ipwave-01
>
> Please send corrections/comments by Friday, Apr 7th.
>
> Thanks a lot to Danny and Bob for taking the minutes!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Carlos & Russ
>
> _______________________________________________ its mailing list
> its@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email