Re: [geonet/its] Meta questions

[Alexandru Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 23/11/2013 02:49, Alison Chaiken a écrit :
>> Is there a WiKi or group doc with or w/o version control in order
>> to share suggestions about charter?
>
> Etherpad looks nice enough to me.   Friends suggested
> http://gist.github.com/ as an alternative.    Either looks fine to
> me.

I just looked at github's gist. It seems to be offering similar
functionality as etherpad, maybe improved with private/public features.

I would prefer Etherpad since it's hosted at IETF.

> I'd be happy to help with two pages, one about Use Cases and one
> about terminology.

Alison - thank you for the offer.  We definitely need to get this going.

Whereas the Charter text may contain text about usecases and
terminology, I think it should be only briefly mentioned; details should
be in drafts.

Some use-cases and terminology are in the existing problem statement
draft-karagiannis-problem-statement-geonetworking; we may need to
discuss them further, and why not based on new drafts.

To that end, I think it is a good idea that you start writing about
Use-Cases and Terminology in that Etherpad geonet-charter.  We may
extract parts from it later?
http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/geonet-charter

How do you see it?

Yours,

Alex