[Ivy] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-yang-20: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-yang-20: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-yang/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work done in this document (and using nice SVG graphics).

Other thanks to Haoyu Song, the INT-directorate reviewer (at my request),
please consider and reply to the review posted at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-ivy-network-inventory-yang-19-intdir-telechat-song-2026-09-30/

The document seems to be only about "physical" components, not about virtual or
"cloud instance" and the latter are also important, IMHO, to network operations
(e.g., licensing cost, power up/down, ...). If the model is limited to physical
elements, then let's be clear in the title and in the abstract.

Some other comments:

### Section 2.2

Is a Wi-Fi interface to be considered as a port ? The description seems to talk
mainly about physical ports.