[Jmap] IMAP transition
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sun, 07 May 2017 19:35 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B871286CA for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 May 2017 12:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id beQ80TkqYUTL for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 May 2017 12:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11675127201 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 May 2017 12:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.189] (c-71-205-242-38.hsd1.co.comcast.net [71.205.242.38]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v47JcKgk009558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <jmap@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 May 2017 12:38:20 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1494185900; bh=1ris30nHUldt3x8vCaDJduYA8HEWun6fCzPrrFzqrws=; h=To:Reply-To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=IjiE/HyQ9s17vdfHzmsIvCocLPw7sEKoChC+qPp952mqKCEORzcC161dCZDdDPVye 55MNzF71qZdLKCuMYX0uW8fn6Z6KcpiGQPSx2Y74ShwLihGf1osHZTlayZVkDqxeHC kgzyvHd4SYku5YeF3hwCax4Wbd6Sj+9O2xGDCBHI=
To: jmap@ietf.org
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <e9589a5c-8a81-028f-cf84-bb0af2e2f3e4@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 13:35:42 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/4kKHo7JiAnml9SK4EZtMVJ57mE0>
Subject: [Jmap] IMAP transition
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 19:35:56 -0000
After 19 Years CMU Discontinues Cyrus IMAP In Favor Of Microsoft
Exchange And Gmail
https://tech.slashdot.org/story/17/05/06/1726259/after-19-years-cmu-discontinues-cyrus-imap-in-favor-of-microsoft-exchange-and-gmail
Discussion about jmap has been about improvements over imap. Perhaps it
should include a wider scope to improve likelihood of adoption?
(To the extent that folk think the existing jmap targets already achieve
that, it would be useful to document and explain the details.)
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
- [Jmap] IMAP transition Dave Crocker
- Re: [Jmap] IMAP transition John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] IMAP transition Dave Crocker