IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Working group last call draft-ietf-jmap-quotas-04

René CORDIER <rcordier@linagora.com> Thu, 06 October 2022 08:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rcordier@linagora.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F5AC1524A5 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 01:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.227
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.227 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.377, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=linagora.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rXe5FEKWB1xV for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 01:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.linagora.com (smtp.linagora.com [54.36.8.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEFE1C1524A2 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 01:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?Open?PaaS?SMTP?server?for?Linagora? (unknown [51.83.109.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.linagora.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B90E93EE1D; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 10:03:21 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=LDbLP2UExNr08n17nRYWHbaOOTjY7c6V7qN/1+CjzIgId1qbfgMctASE9Di2+F2Pmv3ZQnqr4rwsGisYNEJi3sURHYBFjdCpdT9jx0l9KvizT2u5InIu4NPWymuvldz/atsHfN1JFP9FgUjggYAtjpqx+gm5yBxTEmyzf/79RIztSmF3h1DIA/TRsvjdb+pMsF2ELJKojpREEZhq6+MBv5lAVLap88BSSuk13z3t05V1uPOZ2FiReudpehLwiS8e5zOin2lu3hHpmIn/qwNumHLjxHfUT9LyHgrH9JkJgcZpeCzXhmVGv8gknO3lKtcDWsrZdLp/DK2+bdPklgxAuA==; s=smtpoutjames; d=linagora.com; v=1; bh=GTGDLt8Bcvjv5r9YZQyZP8CHPP7LyaLsXNL1/irHgrk=; h=from : reply-to : subject : date : to : cc : resent-date : resent-from : resent-sender : resent-to : resent-cc : in-reply-to : references : list-id : list-help : list-unsubscribe : list-subscribe : list-post : list-owner : list-archive;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-LINAGORA-Copy-Delivery-Done: 1
From: René CORDIER <rcordier@linagora.com>
Sender: René CORDIER <rcordier@linagora.com>
Reply-To: rcordier@linagora.com
To: "jmap@ietf.org" <jmap@ietf.org>, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
Message-ID: <Mime4j.56.4a8e9a0683d4c559.183ac520db0@linagora.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 08:03:22 +0000
References:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/8lcuWvIyDwAYkw5ysj46nW2Z-74>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Working group last call draft-ietf-jmap-quotas-04
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 08:03:32 -0000

Hello guys,

Any news about this? It's still in last call while the deadline was a while ago (August 19th), and the only remarks were small typo issues that have been fixed since.

Can we proceed to the next step? Or is there still issues regarding this?

Best regards,

Rene.

On July 29, 2022 1:29 AM, from brong@fastmailteam.com
This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-jmap-quotas.

As mentioned in the session at IETF114, we have quite a lot of work ready for WGLC, so I'm giving three weeks.  Please give feedback by August 19th.  Absent any issues, we'll submit to IESG then.

P.S. if anyone says "I need more time to review" on any of the documents that are in WGLC then I'm happy to push the timeframe out longer as well.

Cheers,

Bron.

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com


v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email