Re: [Jmap] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-sharing-08: (with COMMENT)

[Neil Jenkins <[e-mail]>]

Hi Paul,

Thank you for your comments.

> Numerous sections use the bullet points and empty lines in way that 
> "mis-group" the items for me, making it difficult to parse. I almost raised
> this as a DISCUSS. An example:

I'm not seeing these empty lines in the HTML, text, or PDF versions. Can you please clarify where you are seeing this and I'll discuss with the RFC editors to make sure it's formatted correctly.

> Setion 3.6.1: What is the logic for "after" including the date and "before" not
> including the date?

These will normally be used in conjunction to define a range. As is fairly standard in many APIs, the start is inclusive and end is exclusive. This means for example you can easily ask for everything on 1 Jan this year as

{"after":"2024-01-01T:00:00:00Z", "before":"2024-01-02T:00:00:00Z"}

rather than:

{"after":"2024-01-01T:00:00:00Z", "before":"2024-01-01T:23:59:59Z"}

(Which is what you would have to do if both were inclusive.)

Cheers,
Neil.