Re: [Jmap] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-jmap-contacts-04

[Robert Stepanek <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024, at 4:08 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> I do have a question about the registrations into "JSContact Properties", which were adjusted here:
> 
> The "Property Type" being "Not Applicable" doesn't appear to jive with what the registry allows.  The draft creating the registry (which isn't published yet, but is in AUTH48 so it should be soon) says:

That was not correctly stated in the last published I-D version of JSContact before we went into AUTH48. We corrected that in the RFC9554 document that's currently in AUTH48. There it says:

Property Type:
For properties with intended usage other than "reserved", this is the type of this property, using type signatures as specified in Section 1.3.2 <file:///Users/rsto/RFCs/draft-stepanek-jscontact/rfc9553.html#type-signatures>. The property type MUST be registered in the "JSContact Types" registry. For reserved property names, the value MUST be the verbatim string "not applicable".

Property Context:
A comma-separated list of JSContact object types (Section 3.6.2 <file:///Users/rsto/RFCs/draft-stepanek-jscontact/rfc9553.html#iana-type-registry-contents>) that contain the property. For reserved property names, the value MAY be the verbatim string "not applicable".

Sorry about that.