Re: [Jmap] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-jmap-smime-07

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <> Sat, 21 August 2021 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625663A1179 for <>; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 15:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mLc8W53uYH64 for <>; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 15:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF8CF3A1178 for <>; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 15:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id t4so5711266vsm.5 for <>; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 15:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DNNr7MPMTcGig7p76/Bj5KLHUPtteS+X5nt8wdsIUMM=; b=XfL0ihRU/dTw4IFxcvLYAOiMxSXnyvc2BoYTbQLcwPz6oy/Zq1dUyy/oLBN9F2tvUR vnqu/hjqk9k2I49JRhh928JVPcQ8rbeoXkwZ6C5Jn3ZPvjb4dLaLf41VS7k+C6MeYIWc SiSJy2RcubYAn5J9utGq875gvhNRn15jKagUhuyxp77wBnsdbgu1mAPVWa6HywucVTZN 2R/yWuJ7nG8H8HwNXOqf6/fWs+yrno7oj1jNh4nALZ2QBt+CvJtvoqvHHzclSEUtqJSo I6M/upMzxO5/iuSeYg9fOPEPs18OvPln6m1kFwJ3zrK4U3QuI5+TYSJ3sNOaqdR4mP3k jjRw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=DNNr7MPMTcGig7p76/Bj5KLHUPtteS+X5nt8wdsIUMM=; b=b0OK2vmGPFbtTMRqdF06C1iSUeebsLbXRLUwW4ERrbR/Z1BlHFraiXrgsPH+ZaNyFW g4enel+dhZgMgveLtfMOF1wIcguOoP+HVMZkmaE9gIj9HpDMTqh0C69w8tQa0G8KbnYs xHGBU14FFDcZg1cK1RmYiQsoku90F2ge5w3J9W/hyNARrAfCfUZ4eVWveCktUFVzKgrb rjTJ0P7aMqj7jQHLjGZiiYfdnky+denwz4/F/+SGqcRYgX6hjU/yGvEDw5Pf5bIO5bHC SuWJHqvpO+hXJBbMlgp0mXjWereaKolK7oDvS0oX5SS5JX8N09AEMq5TUw42VxlLHvzK KvOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ysoOxFVZQd1xCRQoabyFfJcX/zBVOFsmH4aOCCC6qH6p68iuJ nm/NKCvd5dvMTX3YWhukvT8ZMpNsHGjCW/BDIYKKhtPLzVLTiA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4nbNEhna3i6v3V1sY5s0tQuygns5fFfSh73ifjJGsCWCaQOnn0aRPTisps4YmPbyHD5oYwbIMjsuvnWeBhdA=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f8d5:: with SMTP id c21mr21106166vsp.40.1629584685585; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 15:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 15:24:32 -0700
Message-ID: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000050d9ff05ca19406d"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-jmap-smime-07
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 22:24:55 -0000

Hi all, here's my AD review for this short document:

Please use the correct boilerplate text for BCP 14.  You've got the old
version here.

I suggest using "specification" rather than "spec" (e.g., in Section 3).
And while I'm at it, it might be helpful to identify RFC 8620 as JMAP at
its first use in Section 2, because then in Section 3 you refer to "the
JMAP spec" but it's not clear which one that is.

In Section 4, for "smimeStatus", mapping unrecognized values to
"signal/failed" seems a curious choice.  Why not allow only "unknown"?

For Section 4, I suggest (but you don't have to) giving each property a
separate subsection.

Otherwise this is in good shape.  The above things are minor enough that
you can just handle them as Last Call comments, and I'll go request that


On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 5:22 AM Bron Gondwana via Datatracker <> wrote:

> Bron Gondwana has requested publication of draft-ietf-jmap-smime-07 as
> Proposed Standard on behalf of the JMAP working group.
> Please verify the document's state at