IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Jmap] Many Working Group Calls have finished!

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Fri, 05 April 2024 11:24 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF65DC14F696; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 04:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b="AxNB2nJU"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="JdoEGg6c"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ICPXjCW_6K0b; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 04:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wfhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.157]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28576C14F61C; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 04:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4254218000E5; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 07:23:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Apr 2024 07:23:53 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from :from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1712316232; x=1712402632; bh=lIMzB07zTj 30PPTXMpTuFcfPybXv0B7wMH5khXJnD/M=; b=AxNB2nJUU1zu+4P8pBO5GwMa9s cTnf0cuhP0XAYeA6fVHl6Yk94aNuDUb6V/93YkJ2aJMkGLmpAMagfaZpBVSQESVD JP8Qwn69M+junHGYTFcswPgUXFsCi8CeRJeI4xouvVy4e09wEhFDE7umXRVrMUTj IoXzFTfn445/fwzVCHBERtCDJmkpqEIE132ObjQPwW45uaX3RSrnsZS77GIleR/H 2uPlXopClplBREQc6cYrptyscSZRg/1svjfIVhn2z5LcWPyv77uTqSRk3DOmFRoT KjiOeaVGKfBaJn7vzw5Q1Z5RissxsK7gcuIb+hpuwfBiaQy14b6P7r0uAPbw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1712316232; x=1712402632; bh=lIMzB07zTj30PPTXMpTuFcfPybXv0B7wMH5 khXJnD/M=; b=JdoEGg6cM7hFd1+9j2aDi1V2XTvt1OuKYePUwL+YkUUMjVzwdlp b1nJoOGyatFdx6Ng2ID74wTVMC4AV51JXX1VpqHFxid2RtxEqX8nvZo2RSfANo21 p5ZO8NWEGJ/bu80iseljrmrJmDDLroHFFi8E53keipSmsImZfWRgICPDxCmvUbc5 CiilLJLHaghP9fx5opZIeDGhm/WIzHPGpyEzABQh9GGOgucO4E6yu0IROGAXrree eR2kkWQN6bq5e3EVEmKrb210jo4iunDvPxGqb/E7ZzlburPTD6RFkCe/VaestDCi vYV0ODkRpWNcgcsoygNGixqfXE6oZ+eiW5w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:SN8PZvMLVdlcwJB5sqzsta_o36aWI6g399ohukvNONFrPdzZxeZf7w> <xme:SN8PZp-E7PdyIckSPa-ZZKbjZ4v-nwODlYAcbeHgZEk0hRhFPEGetHaQXCU4_xEtD 15qQItj74k>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudegtddggedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfffhffvufgtsegrtderre erredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfuehrohhnucfiohhnugifrghnrgdfuceosghrohhnghesfhgr shhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvteetieeviefhge eitdegiefgudevleehgfffleegleeuhefhiedtleegtdffgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhi iigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsrhhonhhgsehfrghsthhmrghilh htvggrmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:SN8PZuSpzyog2LfJQ2xaFavGiSS7oYdqC8XqiVCJ7B7sEaaXoWFamw> <xmx:SN8PZjuaIWiWpSHBSwPDQpeGkFf6nFlSNPa_W8kzG7da48dLw9_jVA> <xmx:SN8PZndxhxuYfVrSlEmbuJbSDrIDaRHgVO4c9D54tUFLf24L8UmX-A> <xmx:SN8PZv3VNrWSH-Ao5FoM030vVQo9aej1ZnBqMKQ3zYkfjFNA0xZN_w> <xmx:SN8PZvGR_VXmRq7SLEB8jB9VPUV2G2xOfc8tgMw3Se8kVlnR_yPzEL67>
Feedback-ID: i2d7042ce:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7A54A2D40087; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 07:23:52 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-368-gc733b1d8df-fm-20240402.001-gc733b1d8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <47d3be9c-6fb6-421b-aaf5-bab6c0b8e678@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 22:23:30 +1100
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: extra@ietf.org, jmap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e88cd25910bb4c5aab74de4b92dce7fc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/UAlGBU6_hecGmk8SXXuIXzhEwPU>
Subject: [Jmap] Many Working Group Calls have finished!
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 11:24:01 -0000

Hi All (CCing both groups since these came from a shared session),

Post IETF119, we had a bunch of last calls.  I meant to post a reminder to check in on them all earlier in the week, but didn't.  Luckily, it's the start of the weekend for me, so you have until Monday before I progress any of this.

Please make comments, including those in support of these documents!  IESG likes to see support emails.

*For JMAP*:

Working group last call draft-ietf-jmap-webpush-vapid
 • The only piece of feedback was from me!  It does raise implementation issues which I suspect need a new draft
 • Waiting for author input on WGLC feedback.
Refreshed working group last call - draft-ietf-jmap-calendars
 • There has been no feedback on this document (but general support in the room at IETF119)
*For EXTRA:**
*

Call for adoption of draft-gulbrandsen-6855bis
 • There were multiple supporting emails, and one "abstention" (from the author)
Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-extra-processimip (and call for shepherd)
 • There has been no feedback on this document (but general support in the room at IETF119)
Choosing between the S/MIME drafts:
 • Strictly, this isn't a call - but it's a decision point that needs community input, and so far the only person with an opinion is me!
 • Please chime in.


So - there's your homework - just a "yep, looks good to me" is good.  A "I actually read the draft" even more so.

Thanks,

Bron.



--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email