[Jmap] JMAP SieveScript/test

Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com> Tue, 23 March 2021 20:31 UTC

To: jmap@ietf.org
From: Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com>
Message-ID: <ac3500ef-3432-e5ff-3d94-f98b8954f171@fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:31:37 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/Z914O6wqEGT2pyzjVMJziWdrByQ>
Subject: [Jmap] JMAP SieveScript/test
Precedence: list

All,

At IETF 110 I presented the format of the SIeveScript/test response that 
is currently documented in 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jmap-sieve-04#section-2.5 
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jmap-sieve-04#section-2.5> as 
well as a possible alternative format.  It was determined during the 
session that I should ask the list which of the two formats is preferred 
and take proposals any any other possible formats.

The current format is a tuple with three elements, representation as a 
JSON array:

      [
        "vacation",
        {
          ":fcc": "INBOX.Sent",
          ":flags": [ "\\answered" ],
          ":subject": "Auto: test email",
          ":from": "ken@example.com"
        },
        [ “Gone fishing.” ]
      ]


The alternative format is a JSON object with three named elements:

        {
          “type”: "vacation",
          “taggedArgs”: {
                          ":fcc": "INBOX.Sent",
                          ":flags": [ "\\answered" ],
                          ":subject": "Auto: test email",
                          ":from": "ken@example.com"
                        },
          “positionalArgs”: [ “Gone fishing.” ]
        }


Please respond with your preference or any other thoughts.

-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Senior Software Developer
Fastmail US LLC

[Jmap] JMAP SieveScript/test Ken Murchison
Re: [Jmap] JMAP SieveScript/test Neil Jenkins
Re: [Jmap] JMAP SieveScript/test Ken Murchison
Re: [Jmap] JMAP SieveScript/test Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Jmap] JMAP SieveScript/test Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Jmap] JMAP SieveScript/test Neil Jenkins