[Jmap] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-04: (with COMMENT)
Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 08 January 2020 12:54 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietf.org
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B0A120026; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 04:54:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-jmap-websocket@ietf.org, Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>, jmap-chairs@ietf.org, fenton@bluepopcorn.net, jmap@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.115.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <157848809108.22615.18269038960236690776.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 04:54:51 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/aDdVekxgQsBiebVaRD5DdgrF1IE>
Subject: [Jmap] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 12:54:51 -0000
Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-websocket/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello, I only have one nit, as a comment: The references to Sections 3.2, 3.3, and 3.5.1 of RFC8620, in Section 4 of this document, seem wrong. I believe they should, be 3.3, 3.4, 3.6.1, respectively.
- [Jmap] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-i… Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker