[Jmap] Possibility of Handshake support?
Paul Anthony Webb <paul@webb.page> Sat, 20 February 2021 01:19 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@webb.page>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03EC3A0BD4 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:19:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=webb.page
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2RFk7lDgHZ3O for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:19:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from box.thenetwork.email (box.thenetwork.email [167.71.99.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 657BF3A0BD3 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:19:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from authenticated-user (box.thenetwork.email [167.71.99.158]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by box.thenetwork.email (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA00A3F120 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 19:19:04 -0600 (CST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=webb.page; s=mail; t=1613783945; bh=wUdcDRRVwXMmOQ7DB9zkASh5sJvpp7jxERdT7SlAAYA=; h=From:Date:Subject:To:From; b=gL9U9wYqP+lcl7L4oJnbQXmLO/ZWadvN7t+fRj5nADSNwFQyVYOZClLbBKkUiOild TuwhrNO57gu/x980dSt6j+BZLZCj1FelPWjW/K+05kYdbO+9Su65DHaorfCoeknzS1 bL6L5hxA5aLBUrZYrx3ydxW9wfZ/ubDTrVX8usOOo5soWQ/r6ENnZZxYoPWT9ZW9hO ncu2EyfbGxSlYpK1EDQiWkt/V5O4pdlpDNY8tMiYYreO4BviftHcJVattDp+aWeEZu zIcvQlredvMqxuplRKZXaXIjJ5PgbAzpC37wuvoskvn4f72jXID6B1KEQ2WKBDgaS0 JFXuHZT4sqBnA==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Paul Anthony Webb <paul@webb.page>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:19:02 -0800
Message-Id: <49DA8CB6-89AC-4E7E-9BD0-700F08DAF5BF@webb.page>
To: jmap@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/kaXcDAwN5E9mLlee84SwT501Eus>
Subject: [Jmap] Possibility of Handshake support?
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 01:19:09 -0000
I’ma fan of JMAP and am also invested in the Handshake protocol. For the uninitiated, Handshake enables decentralized domain names. Within the last two weeks, someone made a proof of concept and was able to exchange emails over IMAP with these domains. Has anyone in the JMAP space done the same (or is interested in doing so)?
- [Jmap] Possibility of Handshake support? Paul Anthony Webb