Re: [Jmap] Blob draft question: type vs datatype

Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmailteam.com> Wed, 13 October 2021 02:16 UTC

Return-Path: <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25BE3A0B52 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=tgVyv4nc; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=XjA5XxfN
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p2Y0IKty4TcK for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 360E23A0B45 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A043200E8E for <jmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:16:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:16:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=LZJl+2e qn1agwoFsz/bXCOTEIPdywnvBSFgQ11yB19c=; b=tgVyv4ncqSOzt1Rv+f6WcXH e3C/k9ZYe6Qm0cMRzVpEisacGY5ou09q5U+fjaopv59ztyC5UFpSEPHkdzRmbPMD 7QVjIaELoPrVwhwaJegU11WLy5XD2gYuNtRm9rkmElcF4kwHtfbiAaMLIxSl4YaF 8T10VnxDRRtDntgalkS5qLPh+g5Ie3a9t8WIqricyFRddXxakeZsA1B3/Z8dwQRJ Z9CH2dBb9ETUo3nC1blXfPN+ZqjQTrlIFI6H333uuNWXemf1a6KCr6sRBG46hkS+ swnRA6IVB2qu8IsmBrchTLrit4KkPU5MUrNKvXgA0AgsmbxTOAoRNgNgNu14W+g= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=LZJl+2 eqn1agwoFsz/bXCOTEIPdywnvBSFgQ11yB19c=; b=XjA5XxfNUljax6CIGJv543 1m6V8ELgWLBiZzDnScb8GnU6xML3oj1F5m3RpjNJ7sHMNZjfJxc+uAdPvn5yWYsD hmHU7SZmuTXe3k2DGwmxTekLLw2BLkg0Ql3izqH2gC29Hy5LuZMDUgpucSFN9NJa IXmcffgfDcueYl8cCHYVGLaLuexLKYNJZIECE0ge6Ucx7op/f8oGSpBYnqItybbM mYryJE+YhdgPXGFp/AUAS/h/tNmm0cYLi8ufqmNf5lSYYeBvOjx2qCswtCAj1eBh IC6jbBmoxVJ05/Lfv/A4hQY2QB/8fS0RfHvLB96r5yTCy1FkM3SkRR4gr1FqbR+A ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:d0FmYfwLhNBVbd4vW1anQM6FmhmOtw440pGxJtZZdgK2aZ3RmclBOA> <xme:d0FmYXSeQ0eMke6iuGp8o6arPztBAwptl_e1bCiV4jX6_g3_UgpmSAvoHCzhLC98U pUto7uw8zZgLA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddtledgheefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtreerreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdfpvghi lhculfgvnhhkihhnshdfuceonhgvihhljhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehuefhudejtdeiveekvdfhfffgleeflefhfeekhefhkeel kefhfeeufeevffejieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehnvghilhhjsehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:d0FmYZUHd7rpobj4PYtKrMXjV3d5LgYGCebw2iU8dGn8GKS3Pf9jQA> <xmx:d0FmYZiEvc3EPPy6LFn9kiZHipYGALrTPS1lmG0cAax6X_gk4yyF0A> <xmx:d0FmYRDJNSeJl7S7pZir9SlS8WLUPf3Do48tesTk_GfQFbQ92tNyEg> <xmx:d0FmYUN6M7B78B9EUuitbJdzDSEaEGxOiO-vydbtmd2GP0hcbjxQJQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 04D0DAC0380; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:16:23 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1345-g8441cd7852-fm-20211006.001-g8441cd78
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <cc862486-1367-4186-9be9-6c5450bccbfb@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50b210f0-f3c7-41b5-a26d-e308eea91299@dogfood.fastmail.com>
References: <50b210f0-f3c7-41b5-a26d-e308eea91299@dogfood.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 13:16:22 +1100
From: "Neil Jenkins" <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
To: "IETF JMAP Mailing List" <jmap@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=7b71af7283174732b0a2b9e562f31623
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/m35GSSVWde6p56HKoDRf61wuaJ4>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Blob draft question: type vs datatype
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 02:16:30 -0000

I would lean towards `typeName` for this.

—Neil