IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jmap-sharing-09.txt

Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmailteam.com> Thu, 18 April 2024 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F81C14F6A4 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b="Be9l4nN5"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="gLzc+6s4"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Q-yuIL5wfM9 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wfhigh8-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfhigh8-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.159]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B14D9C14F6A3 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5D41800106 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 19:43:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 Apr 2024 19:43:48 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from :from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1713483827; x= 1713570227; bh=rJEkhP5urf/Q06uukuB0BU54dvXh0I8DyICvZ9FFdoE=; b=B e9l4nN5BygQW9YfWRK2T+HGpb66Ci+WI2RKwfzW5f39IPLRi9gnnYDsBf+n+rLVX 84+2yaYb5/aCQpIDz+ZQdWMnn8gNp7jqyTqAmIL5YPV4oZGqaSIi9tRZOi1q5RPh kooQSwWrCV0rHd7TaLwEFnQne1QJ1oMvis1j8eZx4qVmqdjsOXaCMWuqZ8wdlUoB TMIif1TzKR5OJe1mEzvORcttdoCU9YD3ta/WvqTGMNoB5hSNRmsvu03Gw3OFn+Vi NKAG7+SPCXOKMnkM1CHhRPbCUyANWf0q9y8pZ8siizbbfeWHaRubwlVCuMK2XAfD ZNTr8YulfFCxUzebQJMrQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1713483827; x=1713570227; bh=rJEkhP5urf/Q06uukuB0BU54dvXh 0I8DyICvZ9FFdoE=; b=gLzc+6s4tBCERyITwnWvtXcElurHJJ2P6Z8B9Z6BAbS4 /OBh0nTLfGUwBaHoihn4S00cg1GJSC3igWDP37JGFXMNj99UqmotdDbr/B5NBIyA IlaVS0K8kOCsSwDxD8X/qUDXoVBfi623YWte1Tlto7ww91lvaiy6ls44hmcY7X0k BMUY+DfS+ZB63RG5ytdZ31baqYQUqNTvjg4Xk7MaY31B6QwF9zxIFuvbWdo11VKx U9weekuAtvaKtJklJYnVU4JIMT73wntDNqODm0ZgbKA2Fq3RbXPJvzaQYNwyH4RE V754OvZyMmR7D3RNDCya7EuIKHMIGJHuCQqnHWG8jA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:M7AhZqgbu3KJ2eFLedngfWFcYHf7CRUZE4St0BH5qoaWbfQdGvrEjA> <xme:M7AhZrDSWWswUNdXlg88QhrYrwXn8waZs052CNkFE8wY0t67I3jHyJGE-2jkpHTB5 rtubG8dIY4HNw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudekuddgvdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtreerreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdfpvghi lhculfgvnhhkihhnshdfuceonhgvihhljhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevvdetvdduleekhfeghfetfeettdelhfehfeevffevleek uddtudffieevjeevhfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehnvghilhhjsehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:M7AhZiEtKTpFI62TPOAzcI0qoQgn875XJ6i3ryxUuV1NNPXHIbd5TA> <xmx:M7AhZjRJYz84xdH8CT6HbK_pyqqGo4JDvYrXyqfRAQUOI8VPWhrPMg> <xmx:M7AhZnynPgELa1lyl09DGI357Q-y5m_cjZa5PxmdNlAqtf20R0na2g> <xmx:M7AhZh5UXUETlSLR7Pws64yDCbwimA9A8kEFzsoUEMIu4M7N3tABuQ> <xmx:M7AhZlZtaD_4Vqy4x9eP3GfGG4cUUnHwq_PSp9bPYm20w7DXUf8-IdIB>
Feedback-ID: ibc614277:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 596542D4007D; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 19:43:47 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-386-g4cb8e397f9-fm-20240415.001-g4cb8e397
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <b8f87175-fd25-49f2-b54d-295a3e567220@dogfoodapp.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZDMtJ4RhwYV=UxX--4CAP=uy6P-9aXatk=hO0K1at1ww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <171342033496.27918.4121216192863140000@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwZDMtJ4RhwYV=UxX--4CAP=uy6P-9aXatk=hO0K1at1ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:43:27 +1000
From: Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
To: IETF JMAP Mailing List <jmap@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="6e9c14bb508b48b5b6d622b589a48348"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/mY2G2rwq6hQdq4bA-vwQ86BpG-c>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jmap-sharing-09.txt
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 23:43:57 -0000

On Fri, 19 Apr 2024, at 00:31, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> The IESG approved this document, but I see there was quite a bit of activity on it just in the last twelve hours.  Are there any pending edits before I send it onward?

No, I believe all of the comments and nits have been addressed. The only remaining thing I'm aware of is some formatting issues in the plain text and htmlised versions, for discussion with the RFC editors (and tools teams).

Cheers,
Neil.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email