IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-contacts-06

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Wed, 03 April 2024 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90241C14F685 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 07:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UwAshFKPDGvK for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 07:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [144.76.73.169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F3AC14F5E4 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 07:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0911CC0038; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 15:04:23 +0100 (IST)
Authentication-Results: stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Authentication-Results: stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gulbrandsen.priv.no
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1712153063; bh=0CF7efvOtUt6fIGt1lzVc9YoQFxeRhcbe/vcgMLtjrc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UNQBBcD5oWM9gjOX16I79Jv2jXnekikfPIgppK1sz5ocfkxMl9kXX5gntbVc2pUMV U1za2zkDZN4gz/HCwD2ipGzLha653KwZu8cHdqcDCvXy+sSrFz1K4e6mFYoxkGPg7r sz0ZB8Z+oRTBtzMILIjghdq3YAk7comLqJmtEHIM=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1712153062-19524-19500/9/388; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:04:22 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: jmap@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 16:04:22 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <40c5a3b6-d6c0-426d-b750-0f1af0045138@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <5c10be7c-8913-46f5-a0bd-e28102624d88@stpeter.im>
References: <171112316193.8644.5801107423421446407@ietfa.amsl.com> <1C02FE5D-624B-4BBE-A7F3-91EDF54CDE4F@tzi.org> <b5fac088-9eb3-4ede-a266-f943aeaab076@stpeter.im> <4E9A8148-9EFE-4448-B94E-96FBDB6A2B9A@tzi.org> <06c317c8-8d14-4d78-a4c9-9c44cfc3ec31@stpeter.im> <03ef2b74-19d2-43c1-9c5b-b0aa315c8738@dogfoodapp.fastmail.com> <5c10be7c-8913-46f5-a0bd-e28102624d88@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Trojita/v0.7-599-g1d6a1f7d; Qt/5.15.10; xcb; Linux; Devuan GNU/Linux 6 (excalibur/ceres)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/xU-AHQejR_8xx3VqrGWpOVihvhY>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-contacts-06
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 14:04:31 -0000

Peter Saint-Andre writes:
> As Carsten said in his latest message, if folks in the JMAP 
> community were interested in taking inventory of their 
> specifications from an internationalization perspective, that 
> could be done. But from what I can tell from the outside, it 
> doesn't appear that there's a pressing need to do so. [1]

I agree that there's no pressing need. There is nonzero interest in such an 
inventory of their implementations, I would say, more in the medium than in 
the short term, but this doesn't sound like a case where the specifications 
will precede the implementations.

Arnt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email