Re: [jose] A modest proposal for JSON-izing JW*
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Wed, 06 February 2013 20:26 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2CC21E8034 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:26:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.209, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YOUxm+bfoH8b for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:26:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDEF21F85D2 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:26:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.4]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MDjZQ-1UAGyF3k2Y-00HB9e for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:26:33 +0100
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Feb 2013 20:26:33 -0000
Received: from a88-115-219-140.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.100.113]) [88.115.219.140] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 06 Feb 2013 21:26:33 +0100
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/B+tEPbEXBQp0zGQ2E0sO4cQ12bbe7bctQsLKcJ3 KJoBOKzScZxNBt
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 22:26:32 +0200
Message-ID: <i6en5euln6sqjov9s38h85ax.1360182392441@email.android.com>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.android.email_300326693748630"
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] A modest proposal for JSON-izing JW*
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 20:26:37 -0000
Why don't we address the issue right away (as Richard proposed) instead of postponing it to yet another draft? Hannes Sent from my ASUS Pad Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote: >_______________________________________________ >jose mailing list >jose@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
- [jose] A modest proposal for JSON-izing JW* Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] A modest proposal for JSON-izing JW* Matt Miller (mamille2)
- Re: [jose] A modest proposal for JSON-izing JW* Mike Jones
- Re: [jose] A modest proposal for JSON-izing JW* Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] A modest proposal for JSON-izing JW* Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [jose] A modest proposal for JSON-izing JW* Mike Jones