IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] DISCUSS: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Tue, 28 August 2012 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD69A11E8107 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.839
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.839 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.241, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id raZ1hobs6WF4 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (db3ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1D321F84D3 for <jose@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail24-db3-R.bigfish.com (10.3.81.245) by DB3EHSOBE010.bigfish.com (10.3.84.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:12:30 +0000
Received: from mail24-db3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail24-db3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D693200FB; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:12:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -29
X-BigFish: VS-29(zz98dI9371Ic85fh542M1432I4015Izz1202hzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah107ah1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail24-db3: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail24-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail24-db3 (MessageSwitch) id 1346191948283925_3135; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:12:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3EHSMHS012.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.81.253]) by mail24-db3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D91F24004E; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:12:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by DB3EHSMHS012.bigfish.com (10.3.87.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:12:25 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.1.176]) by TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.80.67]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.003; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:12:23 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Thread-Topic: [jose] DISCUSS: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
Thread-Index: Ac18lJzBZ7lrugc/SlOdnZgODbmGPwAnSfqAAHM38mABl1CGAAADS3Lw
Importance: high
X-Priority: 1
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:12:22 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943667AD5CF@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366797E0F@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <024001cd7d31$ca406620$5ec13260$@augustcellars.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943667A1FD3@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CA+k3eCTKstiycKafo+jJWqaXWcrcDytEz_bZBUwt6BQ-Z5-uPw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+k3eCTKstiycKafo+jJWqaXWcrcDytEz_bZBUwt6BQ-Z5-uPw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.74]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943667AD5CFTK5EX14MBXC284r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Cc: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>, "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] DISCUSS: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:12:34 -0000

Karen or Jim, would you mind resending this poll question in a way that the question and the room count match?  I agree with Brian that the current situation is incredibly confusing and I believe that the confusion is interfering with us getting unambiguous results for this question.

When you resend it, could you maybe also give people who've already replied an opportunity to reconfirm their positions?  It wouldn't surprise me if some of the votes changed once the ambiguity is cleared up.

                                                                Thanks a bunch,
                                                                -- Mike

From: Brian Campbell [mailto:bcampbell@pingidentity.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:30 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: Jim Schaad; jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] DISCUSS: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters

I, for one, am very confused by this one. I just went with the intention to vote in favor of using widely deployed default parameters (like SHA1) but after reading this and the poll thread again, I wasn't sure what a yes or no vote was actually for.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com<mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Just to avoid confusion, could you or Karen please resend the poll question with the correct room count?

                                Thanks,
                                -- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Schaad [mailto:ietf@augustcellars.com<mailto:ietf@augustcellars.com>]
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:08 AM
To: Mike Jones; jose@ietf.org<mailto:jose@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [jose] DISCUSS: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters

I believe that I switched the question between the room and here.  The question in the room was should we switch FROM SHA1 to something else.

The room count should be reversed with the revised question.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Jones [mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com<mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>]
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 1:53 AM
> To: Jim Schaad; jose@ietf.org<mailto:jose@ietf.org>
> Subject: RE: [jose] DISCUSS: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
>
> I believe that the results below are recorded incorrectly.  I know
> that I personally voted that we use the default parameters as widely
> deployed (SHA-1), so the results below can not be right.  I believe
> that the
results were
> likely actually:
>
> Room vote:  5 yes, 0 no, 3 discuss
>
>                               -- Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jose-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf
> Of Jim Schaad
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:05 AM
> To: jose@ietf.org<mailto:jose@ietf.org>
> Subject: [jose] POLL: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
>
> <CHAIR>
>
> If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again.  If you want
> to provide comments please change the title from POLL to DISCUSS.
>
> Should SHA1 be the default parameters for these algorithms?
>
>
> Room vote:  0 yes, 5 no, 3 discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org<mailto:jose@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose




_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
jose@ietf.org<mailto:jose@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

v2.45.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status