Re: [jose] JOSE and RFC4210

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Mon, 01 April 2013 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86A921F8EBB for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.782
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.782 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C7J5lropOttg for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB3021F8CDF for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id ni5so2003171obc.12 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 08:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=cRxzpGQC7emljZEvRmX9+iAnI7yONeTD3/XgReWe150=; b=EW/dB+Q+EVxGEwJfDEOzwz28P/tXWzVEGtHsvadayUZ5nlHoBprVDWyCC2uvCYa1wf PmfRzavPCz9eZ6UcMl2B6NZCSwGM5x1JzQ7+xPyNhGhqxIBgLi6YiFQmsSgLkp9V+Jd4 DLgkGPnoS9S1c0R/MAUpzpuDmZcKMxJZf1+Yo5r8xl7mxvziq1E2K/RPgo5WMF9yRuUU iJ4iUN4m0FeIHIB0rTlzS0T/bIRmCcpXYZB0OSccbq7BArrxA6On6Za0S3SSA1+GtKVo nBFz4+eaJjOHn0kSCOID7H1XvInbJp287ajytqldDFhmksvQlyrCBV40og5y4XIxTxdY A68Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.24.197 with SMTP id w5mr4144414oef.6.1364831840641; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 08:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.160.201 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [192.1.51.16]
In-Reply-To: <CAE-+aYK_UvB08yP8JmF9B_KuNp=MjOz8Xbdpm_oR_1QuGF3xqA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE-+aYK_UvB08yP8JmF9B_KuNp=MjOz8Xbdpm_oR_1QuGF3xqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:57:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgTArpiKthgCsAJH42pfdX7kKLkpmZWjTtiS7veVod0nSg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: Mountie Lee <mountie@paygate.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8ff1c30e0a35ee04d94eadfb"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmxWcVtBhnahTIT+OJl+OpoKEd6N2217SVc9uK3VI1F2sISnQo98apidjR+Khd8hmJPA/Fh
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] JOSE and RFC4210
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:57:24 -0000

Hi Mountie,

JOSE is a cryptographic container format, like PKCS7 / CMS.  So it could be
used to encapsulate CMP messages, in the same way that PKCS7 or S/MIME is
today.

--Richard



On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Mountie Lee <mountie@paygate.net> wrote:

> Hi.
> I'm Mountie Lee from Korea.
>
> recently I'm trying to write draft for Web Certificate API as the part of
> W3C WebCrypto WG (http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/)
>
> RFC4210 is the standard for Certificate Management Protocol
> and defines list of response data types in their process.
>
> for example
> RFC4210 CMP defines Certificate Reponse data structure as
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4210#section-5.3.4
>
> also it defines the Revocation Response data structure as
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4210#section-5.3.10
>
> my question is
>
> in JOSE Working Group
> is there any discussion for JOSE data format for RFC4210 data structures?
>
> if not, where can I start to discuss for these requirements?
>
> Korea and in some other countries are using RFC4210 as their base pki
> standard.
> previously and until to now, binary plugins (like ActiveX) are used to
> implement CMP.
>
> already huge infrastructures (legal, physical and services) are
> established and operated over 10 years.
>
> that is the reason why we have interest for JOSE as the data structure of
> RFC4210 CMP.
>
> best regards
> mountie.
>
> --
> Mountie Lee
>
> PayGate
> CTO, CISSP
> Tel : +82 2 2140 2700
> E-Mail : mountie@paygate.net
>
>  =======================================
> PayGate Inc.
> THE STANDARD FOR ONLINE PAYMENT
> for Korea, Japan, China, and the World
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>