[jose] draft-ochkas-cose-ascon proposal to JOSE WG
Dmytro OCHKAS <dmytro.ochkas@imt-atlantique.fr> Fri, 10 April 2026 06:00 UTC
Return-Path: <dmytro.ochkas@imt-atlantique.fr>
X-Original-To: jose@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: jose@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A290FD942FF8 for <jose@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 23:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1775800810; bh=SXBXWU3sbUapY7+aU9nWsllKYNVBCQ6zE+tlKBMnoUQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=wt8AFDO2lQGhf6FK6AUkAD7ZlZ+rX92vsB8HKSwLiIse12U4+H+40pS8Xa/WxIhPR wwavwqXKHepLVuVrMU2qRGJZHPLzMfgU1+WyGOcsa5UWD8u5pMk7SM3vp1TZLYMgWF 2h9+9LwFF8DZWZNXLCZuOoFTI+eBvxG+fCU94R+c=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=imt-atlantique.fr
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9w6AfNrODyug for <jose@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 23:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zproxy3.enst.fr (zproxy3.enst.fr [IPv6:2a04:8ec0:0:2::1:222]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2D5DD942FEF for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 23:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy3.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C91208E7 for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:00:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zproxy3.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy3.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10032) with ESMTP id y8C1riXAXEmD for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy3.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C369D20889 for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zproxy3.enst.fr C369D20889
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imt-atlantique.fr; s=50EA75E8-DE22-11E6-A6DE-0662BA474D24; t=1775800800; bh=SXBXWU3sbUapY7+aU9nWsllKYNVBCQ6zE+tlKBMnoUQ=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=RzJVAWeT/L82A56RiUckXiGGWnddLTfTM7jNAiDvjrjZXxHnc/L7tk6xLp4vY/4vp J4ZDonPoFbMgYKugu7fAmKe2BlFtt1hl/Tkvt5l4f/rIiWtcrMkjpQtOdXgrjm84SB GzD8E/XXWxUNlwaGABxFKrV0licAOfiQFUD61CW4=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at
Received: from zproxy3.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy3.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP id xinzZu35XltN for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zmail-imta2.enst.fr (zmail-imta2.enst.fr [137.194.2.217]) by zproxy3.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94117208B6 for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0200
From: Dmytro OCHKAS <dmytro.ochkas@imt-atlantique.fr>
To: jose@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1895480586.25238153.1775773164500.JavaMail.zimbra@imt-atlantique.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Zimbra 9.0.0_GA_4769
Thread-Index: /n6/BZFeF4opxDaskkWoiZ3EudM5Kw==
Thread-Topic: draft-ochkas-cose-ascon proposal to JOSE WG
Message-ID-Hash: H4UHNFJK7TIMYOFO2PLWQFLEB76M7TTF
X-Message-ID-Hash: H4UHNFJK7TIMYOFO2PLWQFLEB76M7TTF
X-MailFrom: dmytro.ochkas@imt-atlantique.fr
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-jose.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [jose] draft-ochkas-cose-ascon proposal to JOSE WG
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/KO9SZxnSRkgETxsPsesip3qLIa0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jose>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:jose-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:jose-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jose-leave@ietf.org>
Dear JOSE WG, I am a researcher at IMT Atlantique/IRISA in Rennes, France. In my team, we are passionate about the security of constrained IoT networks. After NIST had selected Ascon algorithms as a lightweight security standard, we came up with an Ascon over COSE and JOSE draft [1][2]. At IETF 123, the draft found some support within the COSE WG, so right now we are working on its next version, which describes integrating Ascon-Hash256 with JOSE and COSE. I am new to this working group, so I would appreciate getting your opinions on the idea. Do you think it is pertinent to have Ascon in JOSE? If yes, should we keep Ascon over COSE and JOSE in the same document? In fact, with my team, we will most likely be present at IETF 126, so we are planning to request a time slot to present the draft. However, don't hesitate to start this discussion on the mailing list. In case you want to collaborate on the topic, feel free to contact me. All the best, Dmytro Ochkas [1] - https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-232.pdf [2] - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ochkas-cose-ascon/
- [jose] draft-ochkas-cose-ascon proposal to JOSE WG Dmytro OCHKAS
- [jose] Re: draft-ochkas-cose-ascon proposal to JO… Neil Madden
- [jose] Re: draft-ochkas-cose-ascon proposal to JO… Filip Skokan
- [jose] Re: draft-ochkas-cose-ascon proposal to JO… Brian Campbell
- [jose] Re: draft-ochkas-cose-ascon proposal to JO… Brent Zundel
- [jose] Re: draft-ochkas-cose-ascon proposal to JO… Dmytro OCHKAS