Re: [jose] Next steps after the JWP BoF @ IETF 114

[Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]>]

Hi!

To add to Karen's summary, thank you to the co-chairs, presenters and BoF participants for starting this conversation around JWP.

The video recording [1] and notes [2] capture the full details of the meeting.  Key highlights I noted were: 

(a) The proponents of the work said that JWP:
-- required a new JOSE representation
-- was intended to satisfy unlinkability and support selective disclosure
-- would be used by W3C VC

(b) The community asked questions around:
-- (if JOSE were re-opened) would additional JOSE work be welcome (beyond JWP)
-- why the existing JOSE representations are insufficient
-- the design approach for realizing the security properties
-- links to prior work on disclosure in OAuth
-- links to the W3C work

(c) The community proposed:
-- exploring links with PrivacyPass

As stated at the close of the meeting and in Karen's summary below, more discussion is needed.  The proponents have asked for a virtual interim BOF before IETF 115 in November.  This request has been approved by the IESG.  Please watch this list for further details.  I would expect the agenda to cover many of the items noted in (b) and (c).

Regards,
Roman

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWS7ud6Br2Q
[2] https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-114-jwp#

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 6:51 PM Karen O'Donoghue <[e-mail]> wrote:

> The JWP BoF was held on Monday. Thank you to the proponents who provided
> all the presentations and drafts for the BoF. The BoF ran out of time
> before reaching any conclusions. In hindsight, we should have scheduled two
> hours. At this stage we have been asked to continue discussion of the
> questions raised on the jose mailing list and schedule a virtual interim
> BoF. This will need to be approved by the IESG, and a key here will be
> demonstrating some progress on the questions raised on the mailing list.
>
>
>
> The draft minutes are available:
>
> https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-114-jwp#
>
> Please review the minutes and provide any updates by next Friday 5 August.
>
>
>
> For additional information, the original BoF request is here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bofreq-miller-json-web-proofs/
>
> And the drafts and slides from the BoF are linked from the IETF 114
> agenda.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Karen
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>