IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] jwk

Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@ochtman.nl> Wed, 24 October 2012 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <djc.ochtman@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32C121F8A2D for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nDbAia0KBuWb for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com (mail-qa0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECA621F8A2A for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 25so2943430qao.10 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=9M1E1nesHaMhjkHg06EknGkxTG/M8oV0V3xBHhu4h8o=; b=ZZQfJWJThsb1UMe91q2yecxotQb/FIXgVBatfmFOiSOUo1e8MtjxSw39Qk65+143il r/WoAOtryngCPsa3ug4lXVa+K4jtzfAfajWEbegfNSRxfOq04Qmn/dYZzKir6Ffo/ZcD 7NZD1uhZavARG6fAdQKe8dN/Yc681garTj+bbaIjhVicTrB3Fp8aT4APQ7MT9nXsFgn4 yofmGFmoY0/Hc1udvyX3UrWISmbHFfNozEURMACjg/dlgM5bii5TtawsbqfHD3DsoWxn ClOveKcJqGxbbyvOYRQyzP+YpbI0GCZewR1ScbrxclS9fdhGgoU3NG3tby+nFpwxGGWf zPNw==
Received: by 10.224.27.3 with SMTP id g3mr7712136qac.44.1351108802759; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: djc.ochtman@gmail.com
Received: by 10.49.97.195 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHcDwFziH9QF1TgbywGzi2VPiwADpgdOxzrN1xtTN2pjLJOXOw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHcDwFziH9QF1TgbywGzi2VPiwADpgdOxzrN1xtTN2pjLJOXOw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@ochtman.nl>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:59:42 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: tRLrJQJshid8U_0_NI7ER-n5bgk
Message-ID: <CAKmKYaBNeTR8g1eZaex_Fo7g2J6G96q+-OEmAnUDsNKL1-SEVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Axel Nennker <ignisvulpis@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "Michael B. Jones" <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] jwk
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:00:03 -0000

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Axel Nennker <ignisvulpis@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that having more choices other than (xpo, mod) is useful.
> I believe that it is easier for me to implement keys in Firefox if I have
> PEM encoded keys.

This sounds like the kind of thing discussed in the "Support Multiple
types for algorithms" poll, where it was apparently voted out.

Cheers,

Dirkjan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email