Re: [jose] Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-jose-cookbook-03

"Jim Schaad" <> Mon, 25 August 2014 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBEF1A017A for <>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.701
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OpVo-Td6R0TF for <>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70D811A0494 for <>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Philemon ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B89262CBA9 for <>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Schaad <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:23:37 -0700
Message-ID: <02e301cfc080$ed31e250$c795a6f0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQGFPKiIcwAAEqjcEwinNcWM88lucpx2h/Wg
Subject: Re: [jose] Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-jose-cookbook-03
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:37:21 -0000

This closes the last call period on this document.

While Brian is right and it would be nice if there was a verification on the
non-compact form of the examples.  I don't believe that this is a blocker
for advancement.

I am not sure that I understand all of Mike's requests, but it appears that
Matt does so this should be able to be incorporated without any problems.

I believe that Matt should be able to issue a new version of the document
and we should be able to progress it to our AD for processing.


-----Original Message-----
From: jose [] On Behalf Of Karen ODonoghue
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 7:42 AM
Subject: [jose] Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for


This message starts a two week working group last call for the jose cookbook
document "Examples of Protecting Content using JavaScript Object Signing and
Encryption (JOSE)"

Please review the document and send comments, questions to the Working Group
mailing list < jose at > or the co-chairs <jose-chairs at > before the end of the WGLC. 

Please note that suggested changes which include proposed text will be more
strongly considered than those without. Additionally, even if you have no
comments, statements to the effect that "I have read this document and
believe it is ready for publication" are helpful.

Karen and Jim

jose mailing list