Re: [jose] CFRG ECC in JOSE

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 11 November 2015 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBB01B3411 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:27:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8eASAhaTxV-d for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:27:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x233.google.com (mail-yk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D03B1AC412 for <jose@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:27:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ykba77 with SMTP id a77so24624291ykb.2 for <jose@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:27:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Q1MxJCWk5SFCLbhXeevt57asGeNXRCB1gpU67A6z0sA=; b=YXLmBByvTnagq9HbTwTaREAEhVeLqFwFKbUTsx94c8pGDx73enrMaaNiRTCsgPwuHh 54mS98HKzoow/r4KYwYr8RQrLucapSFzFFdJ31nquiZ4Dj1GDoDa4DlEKedjpvfHTi8F eQWp8A+GuBAqLEYAlZWd3Ef4Iv1QG5/xKbc4WrXhrwSIV3jvFT2t8mrEVOSmfhCxzOyN AXGfeOPN3vF57HC6CpDQFz1+dEbRU1TfMcfzysDScNQYwKjkRYJylv+gAQikff74OL3N BYufeVOhDXcnYPm/fP5B3mjCHHAYT5BFnmRsrsA7BSRDbx1O5NbLwxOJE6SBxHF2lny2 T8Yg==
X-Received: by 10.13.204.2 with SMTP id o2mr2425324ywd.160.1447201636795; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:27:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.20.2.201] ([65.200.157.66]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h83sm7505120ywc.6.2015.11.10.16.27.15 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:27:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143)
In-Reply-To: <20151110211542.GA31722@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:27:14 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F4DA6A21-E746-4D17-BD67-16E10B17D3E6@gmail.com>
References: <20151110175555.GA31561@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi> <CAHbuEH68rtXWcHb9+ktdvU_srZV-CN8mdjOqrH6rZH3V2eR-sQ@mail.gmail.com> <20151110211542.GA31722@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/udRzncylXenT0Q9pFi3c5KHEZAs>
Cc: "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] CFRG ECC in JOSE
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jose/>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 00:27:19 -0000

I'm 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 10, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:01:29PM -0500, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> There is a thread on the SAAG list about possibly handling drafts like
>> this in a new WG:
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=saag
>> 
>> That's an option too.
> 
> I thought that WG would be only for protocols without primary WG (or
> primary WG that still formally exists, but is unwinding and thus won't
> take any new work). And for protocols with active WG (e.g. TLS) it
> would go to the primary protocol WG.
> 
> I don't know how JOSE relates to that. Perhaps it is soon going to
> start unwinding? Or has it already?

The WG could decide to take this on or another option would be to work on it in the new WG for this purpose.  There is just one draft left in this group at the moment that is close to publication, so the chairs and WG can figure out what you collectively think is best.

Thanks,
Kathleen 

> 
> 
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Ilari Liusvaara
>> <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> wrote:
>>> I cooked up a pre-draft (already circulated privately) about using CFRG
>>> ECC work in JOSE. Encompasses both ECDH and signatures.
> 
> 
> -Ilari