IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] [Cfrg] RFC Draft: PASETO - Platform-Agnotic SEcurity TOkens

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sat, 28 April 2018 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2567E126D0C; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 09:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W6eHfyG4NCWe; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 09:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D487126B7E; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 09:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3SGlXmu003301; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:49:15 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=ALugj1kYFE4ynvMJu4zNcVlG+Tzx88kpOcDrQ40TY2Y=; b=hjqnBzF9pDUa3ABdtaDJnBYE3/2lOggzhp/rCqym8PnakiiKqvb5Ipomep+hsRiZ/7r5 X65UN+V6Y3u9+iy1tMOVDo7Izw0/soXaXUShkTxTu370nBRK3x3ER7dj8wX1KA6Lc8yf Z/wWGzuWE0eGcNrEFA028RLRNing3nGpAiF5D4lsEotj3YyEajU4TxoAP6HeTWc9CHeS dR5nxIh7i+79lY3YA+zgnP2nrnnT+ULODehKNblK9LodOKxNQhNNmjXiXOc2FGe2RlQq 5NahqWJaM0D4p+Dzd56UNscFd/ZKbT7bF1Nz9ZfnooF3o9wrVP5xd72tz9X4EN/u5FDr Zw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2hmr65rdry-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:49:15 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w3SGkIEd016143; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 12:49:14 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2hmm9uhcxk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 Apr 2018 12:49:14 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 12:49:13 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 12:49:13 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Scott Arciszewski <scott@paragonie.com>, Neil Madden <neil.e.madden@gmail.com>
CC: "cfrg@ietf.org" <cfrg@ietf.org>, "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] RFC Draft: PASETO - Platform-Agnotic SEcurity TOkens
Thread-Index: AQHT1+ikF93gujSL2kug06GbhFcwgKQI576AgABLYYCADT66AA==
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 16:49:12 +0000
Message-ID: <2838C1FA-F11E-4E8E-ABB4-65C5485A03BC@akamai.com>
References: <CAKws9z15m6WY+-mz5D01vxB4s-TE7nQN56=ssYt=vz3z4gAj6A@mail.gmail.com> <DBC2F048-C949-4362-8FD0-A43A54767B03@gmail.com> <CAKws9z277JLfv7Pb9wSkJ7zYR8FzoAfiXuFS6Vq0x32-3bWx7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKws9z277JLfv7Pb9wSkJ7zYR8FzoAfiXuFS6Vq0x32-3bWx7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.c.0.180410
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.45.73]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2838C1FAF11E4E8EABB465C5485A03BCakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-04-28_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=981 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1804280166
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-04-28_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=919 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1804280166
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/usYryHP8cclB1EQL6-R5USWcyfw>
Subject: Re: [jose] [Cfrg] RFC Draft: PASETO - Platform-Agnotic SEcurity TOkens
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jose/>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 16:49:20 -0000

Scott,

If “good and safe” crypto is not 100% in the JOSE ecosystem, you think the solution is a new standard which uses some novel techniques?  Seriously?  To me, a draft which started the process to deprecate the old/bad things seems more effectsive.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email