Re: [jose] JOSE in Python
Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Fri, 16 August 2013 03:52 UTC
Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51DE11E8250 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.827
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.827 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8H5vbyglA8+p for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog136.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog136.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.85]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0990A11E8248 for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob136.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUg2iEN0EGatd5evAI2Rl2TB3woVMrHD1@postini.com; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:52:50 PDT
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 17so2735196iea.17 for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=DuCeZypPAg9AtQbiu86F9yWUzpX7Co0h5kkFlqDNlRU=; b=RqgehLRmNDpGIv+J1pbwpNcUzX/qDm+RR7M1NXzus012PraO619jVkqvKxst3iXe5n Fbp24/tJLUEA8RnbIE6xCjk33tQAuKG4ssAms4jsOUzYgn2awVsEqX9/UeTAHDliU7oC /xjPrfcQYzS5vyAABdpoJ8kfUMKNmstTqh6SrVo+ud3fkPbIGxGNyWX2pn0KVdiVNDyh D3zt4eONuO1Wd1FCzjXw2ARHYGNwwbAt3yGgF0fGDlG5YIOTs/CtDbmJ2zK9kk5JsOFr z/Eoodv4kKxtIyUebh287xONBPq7GFn6TOt9jGPsdUjvvz2r4EPb9nWuXvBTf1BKQkG1 gMHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlulF7EFIcWyPbwyNHGT0a2XKz6RrjclClpegy7T/PDTNYyvN9pywm+DYWN8T7LiIkJ+zuKrjGBLVTHFfJ+GyMKbY3fw9sXwlwOyKkVleZQJfF9HKjOjYdYTwUkNjwUYBOjFBfxaU/hJbEDIBbmLUZ9l474bQ==
X-Received: by 10.50.25.39 with SMTP id z7mr3781447igf.59.1376625168209; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.25.39 with SMTP id z7mr3781443igf.59.1376625168145; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.183.133 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436B782E64@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <CAL02cgTPyqUkr5Awj4iW=QNkC5hBtR=RnaTcm5hUtdEzjh1nOQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436B782E64@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 21:52:17 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCT6zzjLH-v2sKeWwz5+_WM6NgfvCRjhVagBSM+QvctdoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] JOSE in Python
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 03:52:56 -0000
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote: > How is the ES512 example broken and what needs to be done to fix it? > Looks like maybe the encoded payload got hosed up somehow in the final compact serialization. It's UGF5bG9hZA earlier in the example but the final CS has it as eyJpc3MiOiJqb2UiLA0KICJleHAiOjEzMDA4MTkzODAsDQogImh0dHA6Ly9leGFtcGxlLmNvbS9pc19yb290Ijp0cnVlfQ - the signature validates for me with the former but not the latter.
- [jose] JOSE in Python Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] JOSE in Python Stephen Farrell
- Re: [jose] JOSE in Python Mike Jones
- Re: [jose] JOSE in Python Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] JOSE in Python Brian Campbell
- Re: [jose] JOSE in Python Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] JOSE in Python Stephen Farrell
- Re: [jose] JOSE in Python Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] JOSE in Python Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] JOSE in Python Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] JOSE in Python Mike Jones