[Json] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8259 (7673)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 11 October 2023 06:56 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80523C151072 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GP1AX8afx3af for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA0A3C14CE5E for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 82BC5E6D69; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: tbray@textuality.com, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: zachmcollier@gmail.com, json@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20231011065619.82BC5E6D69@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:56:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/3qaCSOKJzWUYxm7tSQBU7R7BowM>
Subject: [Json] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8259 (7673)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 06:56:23 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8259, "The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7673 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Zachary Collier (Zamicol) <zachmcollier@gmail.com> Section: 7 Original Text ------------- The representation of strings is similar to conventions used in the C family of programming languages. A string begins and ends with quotation marks. All Unicode characters may be placed within the quotation marks, except for the characters that MUST be escaped: quotation mark, reverse solidus, and the control characters (U+0000 through U+001F). Corrected Text -------------- The representation of strings is similar to conventions used in the C family of programming languages. A string begins and ends with quotation marks. All Unicode characters may be placed within the quotation marks, except for the characters that MUST be escaped: quotation mark, reverse solidus, and the control characters (U+0000 through U+001F, U+007F, and U+0080 through U+009F). Notes ----- There are 33 7-bit control characters, but the JSON RFC only listed 32 by omitting the inclusion of the last control character in the 7-bit ASCII range, 'del.' However, JSON is not limited to 7-bit ASCII; it is Unicode. Unicode encompasses 65 control characters from U+0080 to U+009F, totaling an additional 32 characters. The section that currently reads "U+0000 through U+001F" should include these additional control characters reading as "U+0000 through U+001F, U+007F, and U+0080 through U+009F" Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8259 (draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-04) -------------------------------------- Title : The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format Publication Date : December 2017 Author(s) : T. Bray, Ed. Category : INTERNET STANDARD Source : Javascript Object Notation Update Area : Applications and Real-Time Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Json] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8259 (7673) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Json] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8259 (7… Joe Hildebrand
- Re: [Json] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8259 (7… Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8259 (7… Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8259 (7… Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: [Json] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8259 (7… Carsten Bormann