[Json] last call timeline
R S <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 01 October 2013 01:58 UTC
Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A1621F9926 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kQsIOfolaPEe for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22f.google.com (mail-qa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E95521F991E for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id k4so2935300qaq.13 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8x8JXrDmZiSV1wut+uMAvvMSV0pDpNa86j7wkZkWfPE=; b=DzSGrB3xp/yXQ0uXERQ7t+/+iqG3EhbB+U5xMhQnGunk+EWBpmMT8fqGy9BGzKyZRb 7zAS3BwnrmcNIVn0FcxJcovwgF7SvBrGKFeRJTwjkLeHa6V8bXE3us3kEyxlKdaASgYS e/1jLLEdBTZRR3m5VOfWParzSssJaVTmFURpD+V2c+unzPN5h6xgZKVSJzp3rGvjp7XT iQjCf4d7YXn53vzDt/RwKSPKYnsjzSLUQFbfuNHQotJTKCMdADSUvJVXLsiz3TmLwUsg a4D/zN+y52nejMPsZVTg2iR1Ov5Zit9lM1PXbYiiI7Ir95wZ8NafP/Eur03kfBE/zz+B HlWg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.61.198 with SMTP id u6mr18126847qah.83.1380592724730; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.86.147 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:58:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Syr1dBv4FYnaaywNnvUhe+==GseeoTMam+yODQ98tiCWw@mail.gmail.com>
From: R S <sayrer@gmail.com>
To: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, Matthew Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e015372eeefeafb04e7a44ac6"
Subject: [Json] last call timeline
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 01:58:50 -0000
What is the timeline for the incorporation (or non-incorporation) of proposed changes to Tim's draft? Some of them seem to have a fair chance of reaching consensus. Will there be an additional WG last call round? - Rob
- [Json] last call timeline R S
- Re: [Json] last call timeline Paul Hoffman