Re: [Json] Please ignore that -01 draft
Douglas Crockford <douglas@crockford.com> Thu, 06 June 2013 17:19 UTC
Return-Path: <douglas@crockford.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC6721F9A3A for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IT4OCk5hRBc1 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4F521F99BD for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.114.223] ([216.113.168.135]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LvEBG-1UKciK24KA-00zby8; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 13:19:20 -0400
Message-ID: <51B0C48B.60705@crockford.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 10:19:07 -0700
From: Douglas Crockford <douglas@crockford.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <57273D15-22B0-485D-81D2-715B9945028D@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <57273D15-22B0-485D-81D2-715B9945028D@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Kdiin/CQ+cRGbDlBrg9mzRPuHNTo3M+dXD3nqBYaF/N o1JVPxMgf5PyeVL3WZ6UvJZR33VFkTCn6eHQjjP04rFLoFRdrf Dn9sO5cIp5x+rd7CiU7MvNFwq2gM78etLpxwIvEklzAS/XtQ6Z 0GwFVwdJ/+Q3V6JEtchNfo+uAiTKCYiiyHiFXaAKYFf7+MJJdR z0EiDbeiMNP+k5Edhz7rugl4HQCkW8HeixwMRGUeccq7ZQZ2Ji VBoy8Y8ICMcUY2WRDd2cXPT84ny6iBrWOGNaVoxTSrqUS6MRcl 8S4pGjPuf6KL+6frvbyUtc010upZKo6ML3hz7ooZYbWUi6vECV NzvfhAoPGfhUCtU3O1RY=
Cc: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Please ignore that -01 draft
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:19:41 -0000
Sorry for the confusion. This process is very new to me, and not making a lot of sense yet. On 6/6/2013 9:14 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > This is difficult to say, but the -01 draft that Douglas Crockford just published should be ignored. Matt and I will ask him to pubish -02 that looks like -00. > > In our earlier message, Matt and I said that new drafts would come after consensus calls, and there have clearly been no consensus calls on any of the topics in the -01 draft. In fact, the wording is still very much in flux. Matt and I do *not* want the WG to feel that discussion on any of these topics has been cut off, or even attenuated. > > So, please immediately ignore the -01 draft and continue the discussions as if it was never published. > > --Paul Hoffman
- [Json] Please ignore that -01 draft Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Please ignore that -01 draft Douglas Crockford