IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Unpaired surrogates in JSON strings

"Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com> Thu, 06 June 2013 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <jhildebr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9C921F995B for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQE2EQv7QZn4 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F17521F994C for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=442; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1370539944; x=1371749544; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Zy42gxl7e8PaBaCkbEWy7/spthBrVTHoNXh+UuSxgP0=; b=d+KF2jsuHOa4UxQNlwVDRyjEWhmE3lf2IrVgPBSVATt6Zj/yBOLtrcRC A2NTBxggd7WqHnVTMSV129a/MhUFyHzl0pJK3ljPyLlOEm/4C5zoQnB0j Oc9zEwLgDDT8vHk6xSKlsjT6iNg10bEujW8jO//ZVr7qyNIGMwiazGdMD w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcFAIbGsFGtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABZgwm/d3gWdIIlAQQ6PxIBCCIUQiUCBAENBQiIBbt/jwExB4J6YQOof4MPgic
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,816,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="219672500"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2013 17:32:24 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r56HWNbN016555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:32:23 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.56]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 12:32:23 -0500
From: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
To: Douglas Crockford <douglas@crockford.com>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Thread-Topic: [Json] Unpaired surrogates in JSON strings
Thread-Index: AQHOYkg5aH+sWe/75UqTmsr195d0xpkoJhcAgAAOOoCAAD0kgIAAaL4AgAAID4A=
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:32:22 +0000
Message-ID: <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70FC30726@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <51B06C80.50708@crockford.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416
x-originating-ip: [10.21.88.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E12AFED89FDB534B83B715DDC7A935DC@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Unpaired surrogates in JSON strings
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:32:37 -0000

On 6/6/13 5:03 AM, "Douglas Crockford" <douglas@crockford.com> wrote:

>I agree. The critical thing that Unicode contributes to JSON is the
>numbers used in \u forms. It is unfortunate that ECMAScript and Unicode
>use the word character so differently. So I think JSON should talk
>exclusively about Unicode Codepoints, because that provides the least
>ambiguity, and not use the word characters at all.

+1

-- 
Joe Hildebrand

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email