IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03: recommendation to use UTF-8

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 18 July 2017 06:53 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295EB131D0B; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fUlSmeWlkfQe; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C96E127337; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.104.20]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LnlmV-1e7nKH3IYp-00htZr; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:52:58 +0200
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
References: <596CE6E3.3070808@isode.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <92698d15-6557-8bb1-aad0-a0965e779e71@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:52:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <596CE6E3.3070808@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:aECTRTHrNWb703SrRwkLkDAoZ3A+/wPff8hiJBnfPt0c3sUp5Ku 2a4WVS+gUb1H8qhOeemIySdh7lQs+e5PPbS/3Q9o03YP7m+3ViU85976WNqK7Rrjm4pXAiC oFgUrEpfJlREDC4IcF/R1aKWXMowRZQ1mt826Uk7Gyy2JPNGT+R2rdYXAEUezkTVbSkpgb/ HEZJCNZTcnnWDy6tsqukQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:RsNUN4ZRGrc=:QDwkyChM097G+qDs3QtjH3 bTIA9vt3lqif3lSlzQxaoiNq5lmWobnfslrDTRUY9B7nL1p06PgeZjd5kiQI+kpPtLsI0YPl1 OvnPa8emAFhv3hf5XlkdyACW0fednFPvUPrwsOa80UKaNqag/xF+l7oUyrS0T2eMCKR28V3ra xqjafIMCt2XIYykbPNXg65bIUDuejKSakXR9/GgW2CP5qFKAbxpmC+wvB5Qgt772VIkaQNiIN yLg73xGBJotSvjhPXwKzKQj7RFeqP4aM+LXu4/otXlm1opm+OK/WrV4If6rJ0HOaAyyhkDY3r JZ3MXgbk5Cea3EeSlBgktfN4JS0Rx6P00wt4u4pCGqJxExmLgI2Ijq+MAUjAfZvvFr4PIaVdx BZyDiUMoW2qWZuZKcUl9J0W5N1oYCWw5RoPCGVQK3jz3RqOAZNLe+o3OvtZKVuPKGZIYlv+qz eKKEedtIXDVWmneuoi+rjbGNelDH7dvDv6PZz1rTxw9VSrGlxolj7D2L9eTOteEBGTWLLMXeV ia6Rl/Myu9uNyffIga7RVxiY4p/J1N6hRlzrLpoKbzDCOOTi6Ml07SXIKuDSQi/FUoI7nxK1p WYmChhjXaZG12AQiXf8WP76bzKnleJ0890Hn9NXKqRb6Zw7kDfakbBOiXoGkWu8awHWjQAX1P Fzb9cVJfeNUjUMxmu6dxw1d0iEgvtgm8I8vcpGbO0QCgSNTR9Pngvbpx/6y7S1PxlvfVvUwh3 HEQeXqf9tk3zS7+r9ywLsDXK8jUWVfYdWxN8DgjxhLOJBe146Xsm6uWYfpEZuK0bUnoTwyMu4 dfXcwJTWdigIBXN6Un8gDS6acJcNEmA034Q9SRXt44NxVJO/mc=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/7_Z5ac5ReK4xwS_ukY4mEx08tVw>
Subject: Re: [Json] draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03: recommendation to use UTF-8
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:53:04 -0000

On 2017-07-17 18:33, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The JSONBIS WG decided to update recommendation on Unicode encoding to
> be UTF-8. (For details see the RFC Editor's notes in the approval
> message that will be sent out shortly.) This took a bit of time to
> debate in the WG, so the document approval took a bit longer than
> originally expected.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Alexey, as the responsible AD

The last WG mail related to this topic is over 2 months old, and I don't 
see any declaration of consensus.

It would be good if the chair would send a summary about what's going on 
to the WG mailing list before anything gets finalized.

(I note that 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis/> has 
been saying "Revised ID Needed" for 48 days, and I was under the 
assumption that there'd be indeed a revised ID).

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email