IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-08.txt

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Thu, 05 December 2013 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620D21AE0CC for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 10:47:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ppraukSGDcu9 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 10:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E061AE06C for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 10:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hz11so13325584vcb.17 for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 10:47:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m/tjb9fosjshuPYR7IUr2TVAe+JgfIBvFslMRuL9l9U=; b=kU3RR/Ywq/yddpcpzi/9X+qwzeiENS7OJZi7s8hjoYsZEVRGZErtno059iJsRANDVD jlb3KgVQMXRdqBSqqh3OTuXW4CNtTkBrCkgXl81pLmqfd4jZyf0L4HjRBWOqNGlASE+l OWhanq8SlBTM8/raDiIq3UmtWQp7fPSAESF6yux+R9oHSjRlY1s4EWO/uJ55cngrUQ/I 9k4qEJMhDgcWsKayXshZ9Dm/S1pOixI3RAooJMHao/7929XUL8Aj3+vk7N+xYEIPQASt EjhkgwK7L1qE+J20S8V14hRbXYeNGCXgRGBduLb9PHTpQZwTEeDVMKWAgro3q1XlzuZX 6vfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkjxJmPluScdMgx9hIuabaUdHinI4h+ru/Q+vfdgTB7H1kgRbtT8XLpD48edNUBZzU4Z+rj
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.144.80 with SMTP id y16mr65642126vcu.4.1386269245455; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 10:47:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.198.199 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 10:47:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [96.49.81.176]
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6iuZKGg3hhDNXofjdT9hBrDD53+cWZ0Mb=rSLBCkVDhKFw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20131205020911.25035.18142.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHBU6ivc-Jewruz4GYsYC3R0K5-tneMp20fRYv13j8ii+CZS2Q@mail.gmail.com> <3461B710-B969-4315-854B-E2C30B2141FA@tzi.org> <28869F37-1FC4-4F05-A729-DAB14CDA3757@vpnc.org> <CF90FAA0-9E3C-42D1-8255-F8640782ACC9@tzi.org> <CAHBU6ivAkqO7NjE30aUC1kCJhnWhMtpgowgKBySWmD9GHweYew@mail.gmail.com> <C6A73D07-141B-414B-8D27-08E539941084@vpnc.org> <CEC615C6.2F02D%jhildebr@cisco.com> <CAHBU6iuZKGg3hhDNXofjdT9hBrDD53+cWZ0Mb=rSLBCkVDhKFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 10:47:25 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHBU6is8MyYMin59nhQAX0ZAOyNpTD4q8Mp4ri7jqScO0xjUkQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b343974f0b56404eccdf56a"
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-08.txt
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:47:32 -0000

OK, I’m wrong, it is so a word, but let’s drop it anyhow.


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:

> Yeah, “purposely” isn’t actually a word. Purposefully is, but just lose it.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) <
> jhildebr@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/5/13 11:35 AM, "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
>>
>> >Proposed:
>> >
>> >... in the interests of interoperability, implementations which parse
>> >JSON texts MAY ignore the presence of a byte order mark rather than
>> >treating it as an error. Implementations MUST NOT purposely add a byte
>> >order mark to the beginning of a JSON text.
>>
>> Just remove "purposely", or change MUST NOT to "REALLY SHOULD NOT" from
>> RFC 6919.
>>
>> --
>> Joe Hildebrand
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email