Re: [Json] Nested JSON encoding style too likely to be insecure

John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> Tue, 23 February 2016 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BC41B40C9 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:08:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.093
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wy4gxg4vIvqI for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:08:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org [192.190.237.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65A591AC402 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:08:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1aYBll-0004SU-1W; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:08:45 -0500
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:08:44 -0500
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: "Manger, James" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
Message-ID: <20160223120844.GJ20304@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BBADBF674@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <CAMm+LwjwWEmJqcicdwZ+fE3+XMamoDF8RfCMLRz75MpFB=tiWg@mail.gmail.com> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BBADBF6C2@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BBADBF6C2@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/MicJbz9IJFywUU_EyauzMCkARSY>
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <ietf@hallambaker.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Nested JSON encoding style too likely to be insecure
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:08:54 -0000

Manger, James scripsit:

> A JSON array still looks better.

I agree; but JSON validation is better yet.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
De plichten van een docent zijn divers, die van het gehoor ook.
      --Edsger Dijkstra