[Json] Revised I-JSON
Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Fri, 25 October 2013 22:20 UTC
Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC4E11E81DA for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DWqi0fI+Y-cF for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-f182.google.com (mail-ve0-f182.google.com [209.85.128.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F389621F9FAE for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f182.google.com with SMTP id c14so1735284vea.41 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=4HJ6TQHXKs5YbOFuBErHJsW4wIh4vCn9jVGsDMf8wVI=; b=G3zgNrrRWo7AD5HTzaZ9ELy8MDzE6wpRm+qMChFBFiikIhuYOpNwlwcw6lEneJKeGL MjQMy85bncZBfnmV6YyfHEGyksxlIJ168XPiiU1o7QVMBLcx89cdxceUobfoOEyb0yRY 8yanPs2Skz3PbZyJ3TbSZaFdiuotC11eDxn/LJmIvZ9QPxGtbetM/UfUZLRjuNRLqqbe t3JERAtu/lLz2ux5mSkpwwQBYf1fxhAF9UmMBahl8A5uPT96QZA1YdiaDHVP1fCWtBvu jhmTI71KG8dYXIZOR/Xk+tRmURytKCQZlp/WwZDLYkYFRGPgxAkSwv3w/2JqWlnSTH1j 3pFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlYdxm4E3crUPtmkLLwd57tb+RHInli9Ra0nitsQ6TRxlfw3quCHrfppc6tCNTAG8bwi4yO
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.18.70 with SMTP id qf6mr62677vcb.37.1382739602039; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.110.134 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [96.49.81.176]
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:20:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6ivGHpmBukiGMZM4=BtzJjNERKD3CBWDs60ifjtPHQfPJg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11333c22cbfaea04e998268a"
Subject: [Json] Revised I-JSON
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 22:20:10 -0000
I revised the I-JSON draft, too late for the Vancouver cutoff. I tried to make it line up as exactly as possible with the 4627bis draft, and say little more than “all of those interop problems called out in 4627 draft, you MUST NOT do those things.” HTML at https://www.tbray.org/tmp/draft-bray-i-json-01.html
- [Json] Revised I-JSON Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Revised I-JSON Manger, James H
- Re: [Json] Revised I-JSON Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Revised I-JSON Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Revised I-JSON John Cowan