[Jsonpath] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC9535 (8343)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 25 February 2026 19:02 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietf.org
Delivered-To: jsonpath@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECBF5BE1E49A; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:02:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id DB1A8C000CC4; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:02:22 -0800 (PST)
To: vladimir.gorej@gmail.com, stefan.goessner@fh-dortmund.de, glyn.normington@gmail.com, cabo@tzi.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20260225190222.DB1A8C000CC4@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 11:02:22 -0800
Message-ID-Hash: OASEWHJ5C4JWOHDPKT772AA36YDYL26Q
X-Message-ID-Hash: OASEWHJ5C4JWOHDPKT772AA36YDYL26Q
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: andy@hxr.us, iesg@ietf.org, jsonpath@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Jsonpath] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC9535 (8343)
List-Id: Discussion of JSONPath syntax <jsonpath.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jsonpath/5K_2yg0gqbSdAYWwE1vF95opR9k>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jsonpath>
List-Help: <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:jsonpath-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:jsonpath@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:jsonpath-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jsonpath-leave@ietf.org>
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC9535, "JSONPath: Query Expressions for JSON". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8343 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Technical Reported by: Vladimír Gorej <vladimir.gorej@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2025-03-24 Held by: Andy Newton (IESG) Section: 2.4 Original Text ------------- function-argument = literal / filter-query / ; (includes singular-query) logical-expr / function-expr Corrected Text -------------- function-argument = logical-expr / filter-query / ; (includes singular-query) function-expr / literal Notes ----- The ABNF grammars in RFC 9535 were designed to be directly usable with PEG (Parsing Expression Grammar) parsers. However, PEG parsers will fail to parse $[?blt(1==1)] or $[?true(1)==0] with the grammar as given, as they employ prioritized choice, where the order matters. In the order given, they will try to match the `literal` rule in `function-argument` with the input `1==1`, and find that the `1` indeed matches a `number`, completing the match for `function-argument` and preempting the other choices. The intended rest of the `function-argument`, `==1` does not match anything, and the rule fails. By putting the more complex `logical-expr` first, the whole `1==1` matches, and the rule succeeds as intended. Similary, the function name `true` matches as the literal `true` instead, and preempts parsing `true(1)` as the more complex `function-expr`. Putting the `literal` choice last prevents the preemptive match. -------------------------------------- RFC9535 (draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-21) -------------------------------------- Title : JSONPath: Query Expressions for JSON Publication Date : February 2024 Author(s) : S. Gössner, Ed., G. Normington, Ed., C. Bormann, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : JSON Path Stream : IETF
- [Jsonpath] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC9… RFC Errata System