IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jsonpath] RFC 9535 on JSONPath: Query Expressions for JSON

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Sat, 09 March 2024 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB21C14F61D for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 12:33:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=textuality.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c1qzcB_Tazr3 for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 12:33:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 118E8C14F5E3 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 12:33:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d24a727f78so43291371fa.0 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Sat, 09 Mar 2024 12:33:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality.com; s=google; t=1710016383; x=1710621183; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tK8jU1n0C7xx2pX72dZ98xyZQpVnF7GDenSuAIXtIpw=; b=OkzHKTXfMH/C898p+yT8rX1Fq3jfVYUHLiFzWUSmB926105tNU0OuE7rt5tft85h8w AnGX+yPn6JTTSSGEny+IyubOYCjR7BgL3Ljtm4kcmX/AofCszL8xlwGuEjnwk05rB28t vhBvZv8r+lV/+EmkSOlCZhjQwIZq2OSueEQfw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710016383; x=1710621183; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=tK8jU1n0C7xx2pX72dZ98xyZQpVnF7GDenSuAIXtIpw=; b=ctvOKyzK5DUlHuwtN/5s27obKjyJJD5SOQhejm8xOlIzFglO8hhA3142Pl4le2KkHL qp2p0T5BEy3liqJ0o/VCZBQ95O+BvYfmqNZdczu372zWyOA2LBAicFPc686cCW4D2QYK R1RtkeVJ+WCptbQ7x8LfTUwActKXKpewaNWzMEyTWInF/dL3YGKGvnl/gPN3Jctrrb7i OOSl813taxIR7XcVdMA2e51ZnP0j3F6g6jkJzxfnTVpisDkxOkIECjbVymY6JQ1kuIHF X+HQnyPM+3X/Hy55QFSCE4lvoYTzYcgSi7q/Vw/SIaQe/eHnK/GCUhLj/71/OiqocnwT NlSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwDiW+gYmAgUYJA7yKADkY/sdsTEyo1JjdSj4z7O3MIYnueI7PR 7VDY5mmX4s6uGYYDftHhMfIFmlZ5F0fuQq2J/mxJytSTJPtHUcO1eQlxYLwlG9wOn4rfqIvQaUZ Sq77p3CsuOPKXX9hnt37CkRvfw6+v1zsczuWQc5g1R6XwgHZ1
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFlwC1gP1ssqLv3gMWhDWIo1sJoY5cNaDTRqRNUWLaSvE20PPjOdRmqrnN3SeIXyOApCylW1OpheekQBfymY/I=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a37a:0:b0:2d3:56df:ea4b with SMTP id i26-20020a2ea37a000000b002d356dfea4bmr1342384ljn.41.1710016382306; Sat, 09 Mar 2024 12:33:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 12:33:01 -0800
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 12:32:57 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mimestream 1.2.6)
References: <20240222050037.7739C1F73698@rfcpa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwbD1PfUqn6k_=D56KPeC9BAno4NT9U6F_e=_vf699YFEw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbD1PfUqn6k_=D56KPeC9BAno4NT9U6F_e=_vf699YFEw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 12:33:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHBU6ivpNV8EmXJcnvQ0NWHDyf_PaZ58HcEDkvkxf+1kQwxp6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: jsonpath@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000732ee06134037fe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jsonpath/BQz6G83BWcWHsgqJJ6wMCHJgiqw>
Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] RFC 9535 on JSONPath: Query Expressions for JSON
X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of JSONPath syntax <jsonpath.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jsonpath/>
List-Post: <mailto:jsonpath@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 20:33:09 -0000

I’m not against future revisions of JSONPath, but we need experience with
the adoption (or not) of this version before anyone does anything further.
Let’s close the WG.

On Mar 9, 2024 at 12:30:59 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 9:01 PM <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>
>> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>>
>>
>>         RFC 9535
>>
>>         Title:      JSONPath: Query Expressions for JSON
>>         Author:     S. Gössner, Ed.,
>>                     G. Normington, Ed.,
>>                     C. Bormann, Ed.
>>         Status:     Standards Track
>>         Stream:     IETF
>>         Date:       February 2024
>>         Mailbox:    stefan.goessner@fh-dortmund.de,
>>                     glyn.normington@gmail.com,
>>                     cabo@tzi.org
>>         Pages:      62
>>         Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
>>
>>         I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-21.txt
>>
>>         URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9535
>>
>>         DOI:        10.17487/RFC9535
>>
>> JSONPath defines a string syntax for selecting and extracting JSON
>> (RFC 8259) values from within a given JSON value.
>>
>> This document is a product of the JSON Path Working Group of the IETF.
>>
>> This is now a Proposed Standard.
>> [...]
>>
>
> Congrats all for a job well done!
>
> This concludes the current charter.  Has the working group discussed
> rechartering to do other work, or will the working group now close?
>
> -MSK, ART Area Director
>
> --
> JSONpath mailing list
> JSONpath@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email