[Jsonpath] Closing issues (not really: Re: I-D Action: draft-bormann-jsonpath-iregexp-02.txt)

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

Hi Greg,

On 2022-01-18, at 05:59, Greg Dennis <gregsdennis=[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Carsten, you have closed a number (lot) of issues recently,

25, I think.

> but it seems that many of them were open discussions still.

If by that you mean “wide open, meandering, aimless discussion”, I can probably agree :-)
Actually, many discussions were useful at their time, but are no longer providing actionable content with the direction the document has taken.

> It would be helpful if a summary of the decision or change were included in the closure.

I think I added a comment why I closed them to each of them.
7 of them also got a “revisit-after-base-done” tag, so we remember to look at them once the base document is done:

https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3Arevisit-after-base-done

If you don’t agree with closing one of the 25 issues, please:
- do one of:
  — reopen the issue,
  - add a revisit-after-base-done tag, or 
  - add a new issue that focuses the question we actually need to decide
— also, please bring it up in the interim today.

Thank you!

Grüße, Carsten