[Jsonpath] JSONPath or JMESPath
Davide Bettio <davide.bettio@ispirata.com> Tue, 11 August 2020 16:18 UTC
Return-Path: <davide.bettio@ispirata.com>
X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E733A115C for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ispirata.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K7ZwGZ8ii8Kb for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32F633A1162 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id g75so2951571wme.4 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ispirata.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=O0t3lw+b25Ar2VZqhIAB2D747Rf5htCRNkB+4klwjNo=; b=PGp45UPodzPRLcJ/itMOgXGL22bwDkWYl10iIz+wD+x95DorXo6P54s+/aU4ij3K3m DgK1KeVoFVeoOtvV8sH6+u8YKkjKu/EF43LRZuyA25nBkCu3PiHvjohlb5W4e5wbjXgR g9cGLjRmg0k8ahDSI24wHvj5YonKXay3ZTbTXyAvZw6P+1CYqPoA+AHQfmassYYM2BZT sZZn288xni/abg+lG3r4qB4sz5X7bOUvHOk7WosW8YuXPXCA3KvoiyTyGYH5GWssd/O5 zb1FuU37mDCaDSsfBZ2HWC/RBKM6n3lup4F43S7aiKvQ4sDwAm3llr5IRPzLqLwT9HUQ 3L+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=O0t3lw+b25Ar2VZqhIAB2D747Rf5htCRNkB+4klwjNo=; b=Y0oSRfoajxbPRE19lo2pYkzUOPC7mK/4EHvC5IBGKkZ347f8PipP+xftvGy5Tk5Jys Ws8rjzDfgdEL++OmAoHvHkTEHFlq83HbBDfYejifs2RkGfsSc0Y8GFfsZpJE5p/lpctk 0WETA1hiIHeuCOIHKkWaJUdpk2TSSabu52Z9tjIv2XI+eUdKKvjb4+T4/t3n6YZPv0vd a5kwuTmUsJ6/ShoDvm/sL0zXpj9eB45EobCtVl0S87GxlJHbc+dQyEt1uQSYLDqE5wuc vADeQECp2HyIUTyIfsx5pbyfZd0cRNWsUw2jkISzF2l7yypKNyCd0/BUYiUZeHKMgxpZ w+MQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325PICPMG7KsQCUByMFfR8VbQFnmMJKIEwGKlqfDY8Z5jH4kis6 eNPWkCoYdfzIpvNkzt7+m1dz+01iZ1PR1dCCYoSygdy4gRc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZ5F0a9b85RApysJOD1jhYiTZUHyFozt6o2zU6oozIWJo7jzjL7r/k8mBjYxEP0EH8Dc05YZxisp1iRd9yL/U=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:66c5:: with SMTP id a188mr4516306wmc.173.1597162682305; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Davide Bettio <davide.bettio@ispirata.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 18:17:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAWU5L7PtaFsLd=cXthzDLvr89Va=tCLN04xk2O8VA8Gom5UDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: jsonpath@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jsonpath/KmJouCRUjHH4lu84PEGmzZUUDEw>
Subject: [Jsonpath] JSONPath or JMESPath
X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page <jsonpath.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jsonpath/>
List-Post: <mailto:jsonpath@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 16:18:09 -0000
Hello, Darrel Miller on dispatch@ietf.org started a "JSONPath or JMESPath" thread, I think we should take a decision on this topic before making any other decision. If we go for JMESPath, discussing JSONPath here would be useless, so can we prioritise this topic? Regards, Davide Bettio.
- [Jsonpath] JSONPath or JMESPath Davide Bettio
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath or JMESPath Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath or JMESPath Stefan Hagen
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath or JMESPath Tim Bray
- Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath or JMESPath Davide Bettio