IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jsonpath] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-jsonpath-iregexp-03

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Thu, 04 May 2023 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48587C165767 for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2023 07:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=textuality.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XpFKlKLICnyZ for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2023 07:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 920BAC15199B for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2023 07:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-50bcc565280so805111a12.2 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 May 2023 07:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality.com; s=google; t=1683210205; x=1685802205; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=V/88wsaKaf9+0xbQxgdUqzY1AisMhDVptc6KuqwuNkE=; b=Ku2v4kA/Jl5jinJdWd96lnrgh7ulAUjzSydqSS9PARLDLKDpHkU9ucRZo8fjh3+R0Y Swc0KTQ7IPyfV22Y+Z8Ra+07bHs3ZzvgVf8DVhOAKjWtuKNPUbXa9vA4z33arM/rqvla WIWYWtMznlxWImCjTX1Ez2KHpsD19NliVCv94=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683210205; x=1685802205; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=V/88wsaKaf9+0xbQxgdUqzY1AisMhDVptc6KuqwuNkE=; b=aNKoyrH2xULBjsNLr5MwCo0t6GA0VwQzG9RWX3zCzgbwJ8XzM0J3qZZ4Ibqfa9/hoL irQMXlSXQU9uv7EFF0mVMMv/XpFr0Pg8sMck/+etNW0ciy2gk+AQheAcBRSlQ/LF/R5k ldE5yT2mdcxgSrMgxAAiuDOu/mjoniUYoz7fiThfkvrbByuCcjxzhCsmvRMTv8+lDWuj wmYiPhDAi1kEOnGqfcNcQoi9eiuYGTScYLr3I03frBbWIo9f/oyyowm2NTb7P3kgkzWU 5qB2IFyUgwvptpgAjOipZgNZJEMblIB2ksnzW9418Ti8N6DEpAi7DGJSswV9dE2+aWD1 +wRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwwPy1nahZvQqi6vMAiclzpD8tfHU8w30gQjUfgmHx8GpfdzVYh GVpbcQz2uN7vsu0hTIpeA6EcWbbgHwLDjbI7/vsA79jTD5kg4tBEHVs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4k++GMaNcF6y7qLwiFmxMVXCqEGCjOuDDlCZPTFDQZnRb4ADKCpr17T9jMs4zym18tHouVPTifuOY4iuEqvJI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1351:b0:508:14f2:399c with SMTP id y17-20020a056402135100b0050814f2399cmr2355628edw.10.1683210204728; Thu, 04 May 2023 07:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <167579039728.52004.3115613128496850079@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwb92heqRP2spG4or3EP9+7uyHAX9sUXzjOcH=sZhOMTHg@mail.gmail.com> <76D33AA1-B1E6-4757-8C60-A98178FF5903@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <76D33AA1-B1E6-4757-8C60-A98178FF5903@tzi.org>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 07:23:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6isO_wbhE+OBoHz6POqTRmC8bdn-20LnPssHd0-xcaOVUw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, jsonpath@ietf.org, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, James <james.ietf@gmail.com>, jsonpath-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000055eb2805fadeeab5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jsonpath/Wip9rSpMy5iS3NbYAqCKoJQ4ixE>
Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-jsonpath-iregexp-03
X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page <jsonpath.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jsonpath/>
List-Post: <mailto:jsonpath@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 14:23:30 -0000

Looks like we're agreed. Yes Carsten, if you could put in Murray's
introductory text and update, thanks. Sounds like the MUST-document is OK
on balance.

On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 1:38 AM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> On 4. May 2023, at 07:26, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all, quick AD review here, standing in for Francesca.  Thanks for
> putting this together.  Just a couple of suggestions.
> >
> > * The term "regexp" suddenly begins appearing even though it's never
> defined.  I realize this is likely obvious to the target audience, but in
> the interests of being thorough, I suggest you do this in Section 1:
> >
> > OLD:
> >
> > This specification describes an interoperable regular expression flavor,
> I-Regexp.
> >
> > NEW:
> >
> > This specification describes an interoperable regular expression
> ("regexp") flavor, I-Regexp.
>
> Makes sense (ignoring the regexp vs. regex vs. RE thing, and the fact that
> few regexps are actual regular expressions — I-Regexps are, though).  Do
> you want a new revision with that change?  I can do that tomorrow.
>
> > * The SHOULD in Section 3.1 is curious.  I've never seen
> interoperability language applied to documentation.
>
> I’ve seen a lot of those… Mostly people are trying to discuss them away,
> but here this is an actual interoperability requirement.
> (Mostly repeating draft-iab-protocol-maintenance in simpler words.)
> We will get much worse interoperability if we don’t make this a (soft)
> requirement on implementations.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
>
> > It's fine to leave it, just thought I'd mention it.
> >
> > Let me know what you think.  Happy to send it on its way once there's
> been a response.
> >
> > -MSK
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 9:20 AM James Gruessing via Datatracker <
> noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> > James Gruessing has requested publication of
> draft-ietf-jsonpath-iregexp-03 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the
> JSONPATH working group.
> >
> > Please verify the document's state at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jsonpath-iregexp/
> >
> >
> > --
> > JSONpath mailing list
> > JSONpath@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath
> > --
> > JSONpath mailing list
> > JSONpath@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email