Re: [karp] RSVP group keying draft on IESG agenda

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Thu, 04 August 2011 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF98321F8BAC for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 09:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0NZr2afJ+VxX for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 09:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hgblob.out.tigertech.net (hgblob-ipv6.tigertech.net [IPv6:2604:4f00::1:0:0:22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BCD21F8BAB for <karp@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 09:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hgblob.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8219B3245A99; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 09:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hgblob.tigertech.net
Received: from [10.10.10.100] (pool-71-161-52-185.clppva.btas.verizon.net [71.161.52.185]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hgblob.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AF673228963; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 09:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E3ACE98.60500@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:53:44 -0400
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
References: <tslvcudt9di.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tslvcudt9di.fsf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: tsvwg-chairs@toosl.ietf.org, karp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [karp] RSVP group keying draft on IESG agenda
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:53:36 -0000

Thank you Sam.  Yes, this deserves a heads up to KARP.
Determining who should explicitly review what is a little more complex. 
  Base RSVP is out of scope for KARP.  It is in scope for TSVWG.

On the other hand, RSVP-TE is in scope for both of us, and we are 
working on spinning up an RSVP-TE design team for the gap analysis work. 
  Clearly, we will need to coordinate that work with TSVWG, and with 
this work item of theirs.

yours,
Joel

On 8/4/2011 12:43 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> I just noticed
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying/
>
> which I haven't seen discussed here.
> I haven't read the draft.
> I think this is close enough that it at least diserves a heads up on the
> karp mailing list.
> _______________________________________________
> karp mailing list
> karp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp
>