IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [karp] Algorithms to Support?

Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 09 November 2009 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: karp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4223A68F8 for <karp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:47:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XLIKooLljW49 for <karp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:47:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yx0-f192.google.com (mail-yx0-f192.google.com [209.85.210.192]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FF03A685A for <karp@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:47:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yxe30 with SMTP id 30so3660294yxe.29 for <karp@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:48:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pRoXFu4sN2q5TTG3zNLu+BwyMGgwdglHSNfgvEJB/qE=; b=i4ZH4lQP0vl8lSn0xNuxjjHUIIczuZA1iD3hDOBbIb/ef8+/OYKhwWLT6+e87nbNTo BONDgL0JqkrQQW3EWb9OFA1NllpHyO20STj2YlV+8h+vW/n9ebuxvIPgpchGYzhuMIZe eI7hi8lZ0dBpCvYV9kjVoQ/sunlimnzxQUOAc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=xEkOITdaFB6zu0BWUdKpWZdlZ5Np5/Q3hyJJFj/3EZrtcc+JGWJOFg4xCiEW5u0hDH czNROOPPQiq4NFGsGQs40/fkaEuKXcpRvL2wdeanp+uw1fVlgifaV9V3aIBcPeIyzzSM iYCNQV0ejJ8IcC6naLGxHHdJrV/wrlr5Bxzjc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.119.42 with SMTP id r42mr14255975ybc.68.1257799698822; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:48:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <77ead0ec0911091243h663c087cvbf704e1c28b1de8e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <77ead0ec0911091243h663c087cvbf704e1c28b1de8e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:48:18 -0800
Message-ID: <77ead0ec0911091248w446eb0f8yf8a8ed509c7ce79@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: karp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [karp] Algorithms to Support?
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:47:57 -0000

Hi,

Infact look at version 02 it aligns even better for the discussion here.

http://ietfreport.isoc.org/all-ids/draft-bhatia-manral-igp-crypto-requirements-02.txt

Thanks,
Vishwas

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Chris/ Sriram,
>
> I just subscribed to the KARP list and noticed the conversation:
>
> I agree with Sriram that we need the same set of authentication
> algorithms for all the routing protocols as their requirements are the
> same. Infact we have a draft that states the same however as we did
> not have a central WG doing all Routing protocols because of which the
> draft has not gone too far.
>
> http://ietfreport.isoc.org/all-ids/draft-bhatia-manral-igp-crypto-requirements-03.txt
>
> Thanks,
> Vishwas
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email