IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [karp] New Version Notification for draft-chunduri-karp-is-is-gap-analysis-02.txt

Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Fri, 12 October 2012 01:22 UTC

Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7AC1F0417 for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gc0d3fyDI1vP for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway12.websitewelcome.com (gateway12.websitewelcome.com [67.18.72.134]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D053E1F040A for <karp@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gateway12.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id 6F9E1E8726CAB; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:23:01 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from gator1743.hostgator.com (gator1743.hostgator.com [184.173.253.227]) by gateway12.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A6AE8726C6B for <karp@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:23:01 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [198.180.150.230] (port=56069 helo=thunderfish.local) by gator1743.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <turners@ieca.com>) id 1TMTxp-00046l-30; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:22:57 -0500
Message-ID: <50773A2A.5050400@ieca.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:29:14 -0500
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@ericsson.com>
References: <D1D8138DDF34B34B8BC68A11262D10792B4A800CF6@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <5073363A.6080301@ieca.com> <D1D8138DDF34B34B8BC68A11262D10792B6128E346@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <D1D8138DDF34B34B8BC68A11262D10792B6128E346@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator1743.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ieca.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: (thunderfish.local) [198.180.150.230]:56069
X-Source-Auth: sean.turner@ieca.com
X-Email-Count: 9
X-Source-Cap: ZG9tbWdyNDg7ZG9tbWdyNDg7Z2F0b3IxNzQzLmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20=
Cc: "karp@ietf.org" <karp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [karp] New Version Notification for draft-chunduri-karp-is-is-gap-analysis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 01:22:58 -0000

Uma,

Great.  I just wanted to make sure the dots were connected.

Cheers,

spt

On 10/9/12 6:00 PM, Uma Chunduri wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
>>>> The IESG recently reviewed IS-IS multi-instance (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-mi/).
>>>> Should this draft address that draft?
>
> The short answer is - I don't know [yet].
>
> The problem is, this document doesn't specify more about or very abstract on how this technology can be used/deployed.
>
> I have gone through this and in touch with one of the authors for specific questions I have. Regardless, I would expect
> the security considerations of the MI draft should enumerate any particulars differences it may have specific to MI and
> the karp draft should derive any new requirements including say for e.g.,  group keying.
>
> --
> Uma C.
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email