Re: [kitten] draft-kaduk-kitten-des-des-des-die-die-die-01.txt
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 05 April 2017 15:53 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CEFC12704B for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TIRYvHoGrPKH for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu [18.7.68.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A971126CD8 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 12074425-313ff70000005faf-17-58e512f10177
Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 7E.C4.24495.1F215E85; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 11:53:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id v35FrKmS015494; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 11:53:21 -0400
Received: from kduck.kaduk.org (24-107-191-124.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com [24.107.191.124]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id v35FrGc7022006 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 11:53:19 -0400
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:53:16 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: "tom p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170405155316.GN30306@kduck.kaduk.org>
References: <149089878562.15595.17069295528887995710@ietfa.amsl.com> <00f701d2ae23$6d83ac80$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <00f701d2ae23$6d83ac80$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrCIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrftJ6GmEQetiPotVB+wsjm5exeLA 5LHr6A92jyVLfjIFMEVx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZZzZsZGtoJ2lYlJ7ZAPjROYuRk4OCQETiZtb bzJ1MXJxCAm0MUn8mzmbDcLZwCixp+8FC0iVkMAVJok/GxxAbBYBFYmOH3/ZQGw2ILuh+zLY JBEBVYkH61YxgdjMAsISy9ecBasRFnCX+LN1HZjNC7TtwIe/TBAzKyWed01lgYgLSpyc+YQF oldL4sa/l0A1HEC2tMTyfxwgYU4Be4nTr04wgtiiAsoSDTMeME9gFJiFpHsWku5ZCN0LGJlX Mcqm5Fbp5iZm5hSnJusWJyfm5aUW6Vro5WaW6KWmlG5iBAUou4vqDsY5f70OMQpwMCrx8Ho8 fhIhxJpYVlyZe4hRkoNJSZRXwQcoxJeUn1KZkVicEV9UmpNafIhRgoNZSYR3If/TCCHelMTK qtSifJiUNAeLkjivuEZjhJBAemJJanZqakFqEUxWhoNDSYJXSxCoUbAoNT21Ii0zpwQhzcTB CTKcB2h4LEgNb3FBYm5xZjpE/hSjLseN4wfeMAmx5OXnpUqJ87qDFAmAFGWU5sHNASUWiez9 Na8YxYHeEuYtB6niASYluEmvgJYwAS15cuchyJKSRISUVAOjlnFI+/VNy/8v+pbJ6FWz5fXh oA8rj8aHSri+Myv8sar1Mc8Uy08CZ6o/5W01SFTRmsc2w8nwpubvB1OfPFRs/+B2ea3u+eI9 ufluriUHI3e2dDx9n/+ESWaeuK/RjC82sU8fXD+08INH7JmeFws9m34/kOHj+6ZjoTXNg6Uq f3qX3nMhntnHlViKMxINtZiLihMBGh2glQcDAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/-HCDJ-rrp8LyqnpyfNMJK2KWGBA>
Subject: Re: [kitten] draft-kaduk-kitten-des-des-des-die-die-die-01.txt
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 15:53:27 -0000
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:43:46PM +0100, tom p. wrote: > From the title, I was expecting an equivalent to RFC7465 but that is not > what this is; I think it should be. Which WG is best placed to do this, > I am easy about. I'm not sure I understand the question. You are interested in prohibiting triple-DES cipher suites from use in TLS? That would best be done in the TLS WG. This draft was given its name as a homage to RFC 6649, which AFAIK was the first document to use that construction. -Ben